Search Results

1. Aldridge & Ors as Trustees of the SL & KM Aldridge Family Trust v Boe [2010] NZWHT Auckland 31 [pdf, 304 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000067 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 31 BETWEEN STEPHEN LESLIE ALDRIDGE, KATHLEEN MARGARET ALDRIDGE AND CA TRUSTEES LTD AS TRUSTEES OF THE SL & KM ALDRIDGE FAMILY TRUST Claimants AND JOHN WILLIAM AND ROBYN BOE AND KAY LYNETTE PEEBLES First Respondents AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND BRUCE ROBERT SCOTT (Removed) Third Respondent AND MICHAEL SWART Fourth Respondent AND KE

2. LCRO 211/2018 AB v CD (3 July 2019) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...AB had applied to this Office for a review of the Committee's decision on this and other issues concerning Mr CD's conduct when acting for [JJ]. 9 and related attendances, discovery, exploring settlement options, reviewing amended statement of claim and preparing an amended statement of defence. [60] The Committee was satisfied that there was “no duplication with [Mr CD’s] fees previously charged” in invoice 1444, 23 December 2015, in relation to the amended state...

3. [2020] NZEmpC 149 Bay of Plenty District Health Board v CultureSafe NZ Ltd [pdf, 438 KB]

   ...judgment resolves jurisdictional issues only. At this stage, the Court is not required to make any findings as to whether any punitive declarations or orders should be made. The facts Background [8] The issues in this case arise from a statement of problem filed by Ms Shaw in the Authority, in which she advanced disadvantage grievances founded on bullying and harassment allegations, that she had not been offered echocardiogram supervision or training, and that she had been u...

4. 2014 Ministry of Justice Annual Report [pdf, 3 MB]

   E.64 (2014) Annual Report 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 http://www.justice.govt.nz/ http://www.justice.govt.nz/ Am ou nt co llected each year $4million THROUGH THE OFFENDER LEVY $218million IN FINES & REPARATION SETTLED OF HISTORICAL CLAIMS TREATY56 TO OVER COMMUNITY LAW CENTRES GAVE LEGAL ADVICE 48,000PEOPLE ASSISTANCE& IN THE LAST 3 YEARS RECORDED DROPPED 17 DROPPED 33 8.9% REDUCTION IN THE AVERAGE AGE OF ACTIVE DISTRICT COURT CASES 18.3% REDUCTION IN THE AVERAGE...

5. [2024] NZEmpC 51 Citadel Capital Ltd v Miles [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...March 2024. (There is a dispute as to why these dates were changed.) (d) Issues arose in relation to the inclusion of both plaintiffs in the proceeding. Once this was resolved by a determination of the Authority, the defendant filed his witness statements the following day on 19 December 2023. This was later than timetabled, and the plaintiffs were given until 7 January 2024 to file their witness statements. (e) This was subsequently extended until 22 January 2024. (f) A...

6. UJ v TV [2023] NZDT 429 (31 August 2023) [pdf, 179 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 429 APPLICANT UJ RESPONDENT TV The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed Reasons: 1. UJ purchased a used car from TV. The car was advertised on [the Internet], and UJ messaged TV about it. They arranged a time to view the car, and UJ’s wife went, and test drove the car. UJ then purchased the car. Shortly afterw...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 13 NZ Post Primary Teachers Assn & Gray v Cambridge High School & Secretary for Education [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...(which affected the pay of provisionally registered secondary school teachers). The Secretary for Education does not accept the NZPPTA’s interpretation of the provisions in question. The plaintiffs’ claims were commenced by the filing of a statement of problem in the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) but in a determination 1 dated 23 October 2012, the Authority ordered that the matter be removed to the Court to hear and determine without any investigation by the...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 170 Hagfish NZ Limited v Choi [pdf, 66 KB]

   ...and required Hagfish to pay this sum to Mr Choi within 14 days after 4 June 2014. Hagfish was also required to reimburse Mr Choi for the Authority filing fee of $71.56. [3] The Authority’s determination records that Hagfish failed to file a statement in reply to Mr Choi’s statement of problem and failed to attend the Authority’s investigation meeting. The Authority said that Hagfish had been properly served with the requisite documents. [4] On 2 July 2014 Hagfish filed a s...

9. Minhinnick v The Crown - Maioro Lands (1994) 18 Waikato Maniapoto Appellate MB 220 (18 APWM 220) [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   ...kaumalua and kuia of those hapu present at thai poukai. Those directions included a brief description of the claim to Maioro before this Court and the following paragraphs:- "The application before the Court as I have said relates 10 tribal claims relaling to Maioro lands and the only parties before the Court currently are Ngati Te Ala and Ngati Karewa and Ngati Tahinga, It has been suggested to the Court Ihat other hapu may wish to attend the Court and make claims in respect...

10. Badillo-Lopez v Uber New Zealand (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 18 [pdf, 232 KB]

    ...Badillo-Lopez’s claim concerned alleged breaches of information privacy principles 1, 6, 8 and 11. By application dated 15 February 2019, Uber New Zealand applied for an order that the claim be: [1.1] Dismissed in its entirety; or [1.2] The elements of the statement of claim that relate to Principles 1, 8 and 11 be struck out. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Badillo-Lopez v Uber New Zealand (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT...