Search Results

1. Rātima v Sullivan - The Tataraakina C Trust (2015) 41 Takitimu MB 102 (41 TKT 102) [pdf, 531 KB]

   41 Takitimu MB 102 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TĀKITIMU DISTRICT A20080006586 A20100012206 A20140005905 UNDER Sections 37, 231, 237,238 and 240 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF The Tataraakina C Trust BETWEEN HENARE TONGARIRO PUWAI RĀTIMA Applicant AND GEORGE SULLIVAN, HORO EDWARDS, IVY KAHUKIWA SMITH, JOHN WANO, AND TANIA HUATA KUPA AS TRUSTEES OF THE TATARAAKINA C TRUST Respondents Hearings: 12 T�

2. LA Terms of Reference - quality and value audits [pdf, 531 KB]

   ...following the outcome of the case. PS 4.5 Advise the client of relevant aspects of the matter, including the material evidence, risks, costs, liability and merits of settlement. PS 14.2 Advise the client as to relevant defences in the light of witness statements. On receipt of the prosecution’s briefs of evidence, the lawyer must discuss the briefs with the client. PS 8.1 Encourage the client to resolve the matter where appropriate. This will be in most cases, with the exception of some...

3. Quality and Value Audit Terms of Reference 2018 [pdf, 560 KB]

   ...following the outcome of the case. PS 4.5 Advise the client of relevant aspects of the matter, including the material evidence, risks, costs, liability and merits of settlement. PS 14.2 Advise the client as to relevant defences in the light of witness statements. On receipt of the prosecution’s briefs of evidence, the lawyer must discuss the briefs with the client. PS 8.1 Encourage the client to resolve the matter where appropriate. This will be in most cases, with the exception of some...

4. [2019] NZEnvC 206 Lake McKay Station Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 15 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 206 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act LAKE MCKAY STATION LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-160) HAWTHENDEN FARM LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-55) UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-56) and all other appellants concerning Topic 2 of Stag

5. Communication Assistance Quality Framework FINAL [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   ...person other than what is required to assist the participant to communicate to the best of their ability. 8 The relationship between communication assistants and interpreters CAs are not interpreters. The interpreter’s main task is to interpret statements, evidence, and legal exchanges for those who find it hard to understand or respond in English. Interpreters ensure participants can communicate by converting what the participant, court staff and legal professionals say in English...

6. Pouwhare v Auld - Oparau No 1 Block and Pirongia West 12B3D (2015) 95 Waikato Maniapoto MB 167 (95 WMN 167) [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...proceedings; the importance of the issues; the conduct of the parties; and whether the proceedings were informal or akin to civil litigation; c) If a party has acted unreasonably – for instance by pursuing a wholly unmeritorious and hopeless claim or defence – a more liberal award may well be made in the discretion of the Judge, but there is no invariable practice; 95 Waikato Maniapoto MB 173 d) Where the unsuccessful party has not acted unreasonably. It should not be...

7. CAC 20003 v Fourie [2014]NZREADT 71 [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...Indeed, because we indicated at the end of the hearing that we found Charge 2 proven and preferred to deal with sentence immediately after the hearing, we refer further below to the financial position of the defendant. [43] Mr Waymouth accepted the statement of relevant legal principles as set out by Ms Earl for the prosecution. Outcome [44] In summary of the relevant facts, the licensee's partner, Philippa Ross, owned the property at 2478 Kopu-Hikuai Road. She defaulted in h...

8. GQ v TO LCRO 57 / 2011 (12 January 2012) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...cannot be said that Mr TO pursued this matter without valid reason. [62] Mr TO had a duty as Attorney, and subsequently as Executor, to take steps to identify accurately Mrs HA’s assets. If he did not do that, he was 15 exposed to claims by the Trustees of the HA Trust as beneficiaries of Mrs HA’s will, that he had not fulfilled his obligations in this regard. [63] The other set of proceedings were the Family Court proceedings commenced by Mrs GQ. Although she say...

9. Karena v Whitfield - Omahu 4C Section 6 [2018] Māori Appellate Court MB 170 (2018 APPEAL 170) [pdf, 302 KB]

   ...Therefore, the Court did not err by varying the initial application instead of requiring a new application for the alienation of the land. Although the Court had power to amend or cancel the conditional order, the Judge’s failure to make a statement to that effect is not consistent with the Court’s wide ambit of power and general flexibility; e) the Appellant was unlikely to be able to purchase the land as he did not have the necessary funding, therefore the right of first r...

10. Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand [2025] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 566 KB]

    ...Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 2 December 2024. Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: [1.1] A statement of claim dated 2 December 2024. [1.2] A consent memorandum dated 2 December 2024. [1.3] An agreed summary of facts, a copy of which is annexed and marked ‘A’. [2] At paragraph 2(a) of the consent memorandum the parties reque...