Search Results

1. LCRO 148/2020 PV v GY (31 May 2021) [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...RS was charged with assault in a family relationship under s 194 of the Crimes Act 1961. Ms PV was assigned to represent Mr RS on the assault charge. [8] Ms CB did not wish to pursue charges against her partner. She declined to make a written statement. She made request of the Police for the charges to be withdrawn. [9] On 16 April 2019, Ms CB texted Ms PV. Ms PV says that she assumed that Mr RS had provided Ms CB with her contact details. [10] In that text, Ms CB said this: Hi...

2. Reti v Reti-Steel-Hemaima Reti [2023] Māori Appellate Court MB 274 (2023 APPEAL 274) [pdf, 363 KB]

   ...also the son of whom? W Taurima: Our Uncle Turuki Reti Court: Has he succeeded to your uncle? W Taurima: Only to his father Court: To his natural father? So he has already succeeded? W Taurima: Yes. He has openly said that he wishes no claims to any of our auntie’s lands. He has told his children so at the night of her tangi Court: I can certainly adjourn this application for you to have that discussion. The other way that we can do it is if we get a letter to that affect....

3. Proactive release – Criminal Activity Intervention Legislation Bill [pdf, 15 MB]

4. [2019] NZEnvC 084 Kilmarnock Farm Limited v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 8.7 MB]

   ...and marked Exhibit "D". The Intake Screen Installation form notes the installation date of the intake screen as 26 September 2017, however that is simply the date I completed the form. It is of some importance to note that he does not claim to have sent the form to the CRC, merely to have "complete[d)" it. Mr Fahey also deposed59 that he is qualified to complete the fish screen information and that the CRC has accepted it in the past. The CRC did not challenge th...

5. J v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2022] CEIT-2019-0068 [pdf, 530 KB]

   1 IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-0068-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN P J & S J Applicant AND HOLLOWAY BUILDERS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) First Respondent AND IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Second Respondent AND QBE AUSTRALIA LIMITED Third Respondent AND HFC CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL (SOUTH) LIMITED Fourth Respondent (REMOVED) A

6. [2015] NZEmpC 43 Harris v TSNZ Pulp and Paper Maintenance Ltd [pdf, 336 KB]

   ...current agreement. … [21] As already noted, Mr Harris eventually accepted this offer of employment. Although he had made a series of counter-offers between 27 February and 6 March 2009, none of these was acceptable to the company. It was the re-statement by TSNZ of its 27 February 2009 offer, set out above, which Mr Harris accepted and which therefore constituted the terms of his individual employment agreement with the defendant as from 10 March 2009. [22] The defendant fou...

7. CAC10027 v Brankin [2013] NZREADT 32 [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...of the Act which requires a manager to “properly supervise and manage” an agent to ensure “that the work is performed competently”, and the work complies with the requirements of this Act. [56] Mr McCall submits that since the relevant statement of the defendant to Ms Smith that people would not deal with her was truthful, we should find that this particular does not support a finding of disgraceful conduct against the defendant. Mr McCall also pointed out that there is eviden...

8. LCRO Annual Report 2009 [pdf, 520 KB]

   ...had kept no time records and the client was not made aware of the basis upon which the lawyer was charging. This resulted in an understandable dissatisfaction with the bills rendered. In the bills of costs under consideration the lawyer claimed that his fees had been reduced by the use of phrases such as “My fee for the purchase – reduced to” and “My fee for the above substantial [ly] reduced to”. There was no evidence of the bills actually having been reduced...

9. OIA-120782.pdf [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 26 May 2025 Ref: OIA 120782 Dear Official Information Act request: Pātaka Whenua Thank you for your email of 27 March 2025 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding Pātaka Whenua. Your request was as follows: I would like to seek an update on the progress being made on reducing the number of

10. Appendix One to Cabinet Paper Reforming the Privacy Act 1993 [pdf, 378 KB]

    Appendix One: Less substantive recommendations Part A: Recommendations to be implemented Law Commission recommendations # Recommendation Discussion and impacts 3 The Privacy Act should have a purpose section, with specific clauses as drafted by the Law Commission Agree the new Act should have a new purpose section. Final wording (agreed during drafting) will build upon the Law Commission’s suggestions and focus on balancing privacy interests with important social and busi