Search Results

1. File other applications

   ...and which involve the same or similar or related issues. If your matter is removed the Court will hear and determine the matter without the Authority investigating it. The registry staff will advise you if the matter is removed and ask you to file a statement of claim and defence within a period of time set by the court. Back to top Referral of questions of law to the Employment Court If a question of law arises during an investigation the Authority may refer that question to the Court for its...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Apply to the Employment Court >
   3. File a challenge

2. RS v NC LCRO 70/2011 (17 April 2013) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...have been changed. Background [1] Mr RS (the Applicant) and his brother Mr AS and other members of their whānau had filed a claim in the Waitangi Tribunal claiming rights to land in the [District X] area of the [Area A]. They had forwarded a Statement of Claim to the Tribunal in mid 2008, but the claim was not able to be registered until more information was provided. The Tribunal later informed the whānau that it no longer had jurisdiction to enquire into historical claims....

3. Beattie v Official Assignee [2021] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...1993 Act which applied at the relevant time. However, any provision of the 2020 Act affecting the Tribunal’s hearing procedure does have present application, as will now be seen. Open and closed documents and open and closed hearings [4] In his statement of reply the Assignee says he appropriately withheld information from Mr Beattie in accordance with the provisions of s 27(1)(c) and s 29(1)(a) and (f) of the 1993 Act. Mr Beattie challenges the decision. [5] It was therefore nece...

4. SN v EH [2024] NZDT 763 (13 November 2024) [pdf, 253 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 763 APPLICANT SN RESPONDENT EH The Tribunal orders: The claim by SN against EH is dismissed. REASONS 1. On 15 June 2021, the Applicant, SN, purchased two twin-hulled [Boat]s from the Respondent, EH, for a total purchase price of $14,000.00. 2. The purchase was recorded in a handwritten sale agreement signed by both parties on...

5. Heng v Yap [2014] NZIACDT 65 (28 May 2014) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...adviser in the practice. [11.2] The practice also employs unlicensed employees. [11.3] The complainant wished to migrate to New Zealand. He approached the adviser’s practice and met an unlicensed employee in the practice. She told him he could claim 135 points and had a great chance of selection under the Skilled Migrant category if he lodged an Expression of Interest (EOI) with Immigration New Zealand. Accordingly, he was likely to be successful if he pursued migrating to New Zealan...

6. Linney v Hart [pdf, 89 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 1083 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of adjudication BETWEEN GILLIAN ELIZABETH LINNEY AND EDWARD LINNEY Claimant AND GREG HART First Respondent AND No Second Respondent Malcolm MacMillan having been struck out AND No Third Respondent Andrew Lusty having been struck out AND No Fourth Respondent the (Attorney General) DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & HOUSING ( formerly BUILDING INDUST...

7. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Lawes [2019] NZLCDT 19 [pdf, 366 KB]

   ...and often on a number of times during the day. He receives a print out of the trust account every second or third day when the trust accountant reconciles the trust account for that period. He also receives hard copies of his trust account bank statements from his bank every week. He described in detail the process around trust account receipting which he said he does on a daily basis. He also notes that he is the only person authorised to make payments from his trust account an...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 156 Butt v Attorney-General sued on behalf of the Ministry of Health [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...of Mrs Butt’s affidavit which records that Ms Wilson explained to her that “Sally had stated the two weeks training costs for me to train a replacement carer will be covered by Access instead of [the Ministry].” [21] They say that this statement is double hearsay and that it was not only made by a person other than Mrs Butt, it was not made by that other person to her either. The defendants say that Mrs Butt’s statement is inconsistent with Ms Wilson’s account. They do...

9. HC v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 482 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...contract to use a shared office space up to five times a month with unlimited use of a business lounge. After using the facility for five days he was told he could not use it until the next month and that it did not have a business lounge. 2. HC claims a full refund of the $1836.92 he has paid S Ltd and a declaration of non-liability for the remainder of the contractual term. 3. The issues to be determined are: a. Did S Ltd make false or misleading statements about the location or...

10. Ngāti Moerewa Māori Incorporation v Sanson - Part Maungakawakawa 20 (2024) 274 Taitokerau MB 292 (274 TTK 292) [pdf, 348 KB]

    ...– Owhaoko C No. 1- (2017) 59 Takitimu MB 288 (59 TKT 288). 4 Attorney-General v Prince [1998] 1 NZLR 262 (CA) at 267. 274 Taitokerau MB 295 He aha te kaupapa o te tono? What is the application about? [9] Mr Te Whata filed an amended statement of claim dated 16 April 2024. Those pleadings seek the following orders: (a) To investigate the title and interests to Māori customary land, and to determine the owners of the land pursuant to s 131(1) and (2) of the Act; and (...