Search Results

1. Chand v Devi [2015] NZIACDT 74 (12 June 2015) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...true, are an adequate justification. Then, to the extent her explanations do answer the complaint, to decide whether her position or the complainant’s position on the respective issues is more probable. The complaint [3] The Registrar’s statement of complaint put forward the following background as the basis for the complaint: [3.1] Ms Devi was a director of Fast Track Immigration and Employment Services Ltd (the company) since its incorporation on 27 August 2009 until 23 Septe...

2. CL & NN v BT & B Ltd [2023] NZDT 200 (22 June 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 2023 APPLICANT CL APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT BT SECOND RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed against both respondents. Reasons 1. In 2016, CL and NN engaged B Ltd to carry out a pre-purchase inspection for a house they were buying. A written report was provided and CL and NN proceeded with buying the house....

3. [2016] NZEmpC 46 Ngawharau v Porirua Whanau Centre [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...had been "100% successful in the ERA.” I agree and accept that submission. [11] Mr Knowsley further submitted that a reduction in the amount claimed was warranted on account of the fact that the plaintiff originally filed a defective statement of claim which needed to be corrected by Mr Paradza. While that statement is correct, the original statement of claim had been filed by Mr Moses and, in the absence of an invoice from Mr Moses, there is no evidence of any duplicatio...

4. [2006] NZEmpC AC 40/06 Saipe v Waitakere Enterprise Trust Board [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...40/06 25 July 2006 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 40/06 ARC 98/05 IN THE MATTER of a challenge to determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out matters in the amended statement of defence BETWEEN BRIAN SAIPE Plaintiff AND WAITAKERE ENTERPRISE TRUST BOARD Defendant Hearing: 13 July 2006 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Mr Brian Saipe in person Mr J Haigh QC and Mr PA Craighead, counsel...

5. [2022] NZEmpC 84 Singh v Dhaliwal [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...Court for exercise of its powers to fine, imprison, or sequester the property of the person in default.2 2 Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 138(6) and 140(6). Application for orders in this Court [4] Mr Singh subsequently filed a statement of claim on 22 October 2021 seeking sanctions due to default on the part of the first and second defendants. [5] The Registry was advised by email that service had been effected on 30 October 2021. When no defence was received...

6. W and W v Southern Response Earthquake Services Ltd [2020] CEIT-2020-0020 [pdf, 549 KB]

   ...(a) this agreement was reached in 2018, more than seven years after the first earthquakes in the Canterbury earthquake sequence; (b) the agreement was negotiated by two people (Ms Davidson, a lawyer representing the applicants and Mr Hurrell, a claims specialist for SR) who were experienced in dealing with insurance claims arising from the Canterbury earthquake sequence; (c) both would have been aware of the controversial legal issues involved in this claim and would have possesse...

7. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Privacy Act) [2020] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 353 KB]

   ...With the manner in which IDEA Services responded to their requests for personal information. [13.2] With the investigations undertaken by IDEA Services in the course of the preparation of Ms Brown’s report. SCOPE OF THE PRESENT PROCEEDINGS Statements of claim and reply [14] Mr and Mrs Marshall are the legal guardians of Eamon. Mr Marshall brought and conducted the present proceedings in that capacity. [15] The original statement of claim dated 11 March 2017 named Mr Marshall as...

8. Hide v Official Assignee (Discovery) [2018] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...[1] These proceedings will be heard at Christchurch on 30 April 2018. Three days have been set aside. Mr Hide has now applied for further and better discovery. Background [2] The current pleadings filed by Mr Hide comprise an amended statement of claim dated 19 July 2017 and two statements of evidence. Mr Hide alleges that as a consequence of a breach of information privacy principles 1, 2, 4 and 6 there has been an interference with his privacy by the Official Assignee:...

9. 2015 Ministry of Justice annual report - our financial performance [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   73 Our financial performance Departmental statements FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015 Statement of comprehensive revenue and expense FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2015 Actual 30 June 2014 $000 Notes Actual 30 June 2015 $000 Unaudited budget 2015 $000 Unaudited forecast 2016 $000 Revenue 544,984 Crown 521,810 517,284 534,048 2,772 Department 2,903 3,943 4,977 37,345 Other revenue 2 40,384 48,173 46,275 585,101 Total revenue 565,097 569,400 585,300 Expenditure...

10. ET and JT v F Ltd [2021] NZDT 1639 (13 July 2021) [pdf, 197 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1639 APPLICANT ET and JT RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: Claim: The claim for $10,420.73 is dismissed; and The Tribunal declares that ET and JT are not liable to pay F Ltd’s invoice number 0045 dated 27 January 2021 for $18,828.38. Counterclaim: The counterclaim is dismissed. JT is added as a joint appli...