7300 items matching your search terms
Directory of Official Information Listings S-U About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma
...requested full details of the house cleaning work, including the time taken by the contractor to do the work. She also enquired as to the whereabouts of the $20,000 left by Mrs SC to look after her two dogs. (3) Ms EJ’s affidavit [16] Ms PG claimed Ms EJ ought to have “remain[ed] impartial” in the family protection proceedings. She claimed comments made by Ms EJ, as executor, in [Ms EJ’s] affidavit filed in those proceedings were “prejudicial to the outcome” sought...
...In the course of the Authority’s determination, the Authority recorded that Ms Kaukau did not participate in the Authority’s investigation: (a) she failed to provide employment records as directed by the Authority; (b) she failed to file a statement in reply; and (c) she did not attend the investigation meeting. [5] As a result of those findings, the Court requested a Good Faith Report from the Authority on the basis that Ms Kaukau may not have participated in the Autho...
...provides for damages where a party to a contract has been induced to enter into it by a misrepresentation, whether innocent or fraudulent, made to that party by or on behalf of another party to the contract. In law, a misrepresentation is a false statement of past or present fact. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 7. On the evidence before me, I find that it was a misrepresentation to state that the car was in good working order. Although such a statement from a private seller with...
...tendon of the finger. 4. At the time of Mr Hossaini’s call I was not meant to be in the offices but was given the call given his situation which was relatively serious. 5. I advised Mr Hossaini incorrectly that the last date for filing the Statement of Claim would be the following Wednesday, and because of this, the Statement of Claim has been filed later than it should have been. 6. The Statement of Claim should have been filed on Monday 3 February 2014, however due to m...
...Menefy Trucking was represented by Mr Menefy and Mr Thompson, the dispatcher. The disciplinary meeting [17] Mr Jonas said in evidence that he was met with aggression at the disciplinary meeting and his side of the story was not being heard. He claimed that Mr Menefy was trying to provoke him and he did not feel that he had a fair opportunity to explain his side of the story. He told how Mr Richardson called a halt to the meeting “when things got heated”. For his part, Mr M...
...reports and in at least two specialist law databases. However, the defendant’s evidence and submissions have clarified that his real concern is not such publication, but rather publication on social or other media of the allegations made in the statement of claim. THE RELEVANT LAW Human Rights Act, s 107 [4] Across all three of its jurisdictions the Tribunal’s power to make non-publication orders is conferred by the Human Rights Act 1993 (HRA), s 107 which is incorporated into p...
...applied. [10] Mr Smith also says that the procedure followed by the company was inadequate and contrary to s 103A(3) of the Act, including that Fletcher Concrete: (a) failed to put the actual concern to Mr Smith; (b) failed to provide him with statements of other employees that were critical to the matter; (c) formed a view as to Mr Smith’s general approach to health and safety, without advising Mr Smith of that or giving him an opportunity to comment on it; (d) failed to...
...Hickey, MNZM Member Ms S Isaacs, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr CJ Tennet for plaintiff No appearance for defendants DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 2 February 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT THE CLAIM1 [1] Ms Boyd filed a statement of claim in the Tribunal on 21 August 2020. Ms Boyd alleges Legacy Church and Legacy Housing interfered with her privacy by failing to fulfil her October 2019 information privacy request in breach o...
...due unpaid wages. A total of $20,037.06 was ordered to be paid by AB Roofing Ltd (ABRL) by 30 October 2019. This did not occur. Nor have the monies been paid since. 1 Lane v AB Roofing Ltd [2019] NZERA 565 (Member Loftus). [3] A statement of claim raising a de novo challenge was filed on 21 October 2019. It was claimed that a representative of the company who was responsible for administration matters had not been active in passing on relevant communications so tha...