Search Results

1. BC v ST Ltd [2024] NZDT 381 (2 May 2024) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...insistent, and sometimes racially abusive, and they had no choice but to follow her instructions. 3. The job ended prematurely when disputes arose between the parties, and BC has subsequently had other contractors remediate and complete the job. She claims a $3700.00 refund, $1000.00 for remedial stripping of walls and floor, $72.08 for rubbish disposal, and $24.90 for costs associated with preparing evidence for the Tribunal. At the hearing BC indicated she wished to add the cost...

2. [2021] NZEmpC 33 Saipe v Bethell [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...his personal grievance to the Court. This issue arises because of the timing of the steps Mr Saipe took after receipt of the email of 24 August 2013. The Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) found that Mr Saipe had failed to file his statement of problem within the required three-year period from raising his personal grievance and declined to extend the time for doing so.1 Mr Saipe has challenged the Authority’s determination, but the case is proceeding with a differe...

3. [2018] NZEmpC 100 Elisara v Allianz NZ Ltd [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...documents in this jurisdiction. As to the first point, reg 42(3)(c) requires identification of any relevant documents which were in the defendant’s possession, custody, or control and which are no longer in its possession, custody, or control; and a statement in writing as to when the document was parted with and what became of it. The defendant’s notice focuses solely on the documents which are said to be within its possession, custody, or control, and says nothing about the do...

4. Nga Kupu Maori mo te Kooti Whenua Maori me te Ropu Whakamana i te Tiriti o Waitangi [pdf, 24 MB]

   ...whakahiatotanga alienation whakawātea whenua / whakareretanga alienee kaiwhakawātea whenua allegation whakapae alternative dispute resolution tatūtanga kē alternative remedy whakatikahanga kē amalgamate whakakotahi whenua amended statement of claim panonitanga o te tauākī whakaraupapa nawe amends (as in the application) amends (as in Court minute) whakarerekē whakatika appendix tāpiritanga appellant kaitono pīra applicant kaitono application puka tono appoint...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 177 Kereru Investments Ltd v Meads [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...INVESTMENTS LIMITED Plaintiff AND SAMARA ANN MEADS Defendant Hearing: (on the papers) Judgment: 27 September 2013 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD [1] On 25 June 2013, the plaintiff filed a statement of claim in this Court challenging by way of de novo hearing the whole of a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) dated 28 May 2013. 1 The determination had found that the plaintiff was Ms Meads...

6. Form 32-33 Judgment by Default [docx, 35 KB]

   ...Rules 2014) About the judgment by default [bookmark: Purpose]If your claim is a liquidated demand, a judgment by default may be requested (without the requirement of formal proof) if a defendant doesn’t file, within the required timeframe, either a statement of defence or a notice of appearance under protest to jurisdiction. A liquidated demand is a sum that: · has been quantified in, or can be precisely calculated on the basis of, a contract relied on by the plaintiff; or · has been det...

7. Guo v PwC (Discovery and Search Order) [2021] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...Background circumstances [5] The proceedings against PwC under the Privacy Act [14] The interlocutory applications filed by Ms Guo [15] PWC – THE DISCOVERY APPLICATION [21] The Tribunal’s power to order discovery [21] Pleadings – the statement of claim [25] Pleadings – the statement of reply [27] Assessment – the issues which will determine the scope of discovery [28] Whether formal discovery should be ordered [32] Reasons for formal discovery being ordered [36] Us...

8. [2019] NZEmpC 44 Clarke v GEA Processing Engineering Ltd [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...and the refusal to reopen the investigation are set down for a formal proof hearing on 15 April 2019. Those challenges are not defended by Mr Schicker, he notifying that he will abide the decision of the Court. He will defend the substantive claims against him by GEA when they finally proceed. There is no need to go into the intricacies of the challenges in this judgment. Depending upon the outcome of the formal proof hearing, the substantive proceedings between GEA and Mr Schic...

9. Legal Services Agency closure & annual report 2011 [pdf, 976 KB]

   ...anticipated. Under the Legal Services Act 2000, applicants for legal aid and legally aided persons were able to apply to the Panel for a review of an Agency legal aid decision. Legal aid lawyers could also apply for reviews of Agency decisions on claims for payment. Members of the Panel were appointed by the Attorney- General and supported by Agency staff based in a separate office in Takapuna. A new statutory tribunal, the Legal Aid Tribunal, has been established in the Tribunals Unit...

10. RH v LV LCRO 189 / 2011 (25 September 2012) [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...Practitioner (Mr RH) to the New Zealand Law Society. [3] The complaints received by the Complaints Service included allegations that the Practitioner had no instructing solicitor when he provided services to the Applicant, and with reference to a draft Statement of Claim found on the file, that the Practitioner had in effect “made a meal” of rather ”sparse facts” for which the Applicant had been charged, and which “clearly accounted for much of the fees.” 2...