Search Results

1. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – government report back on 15th-17th reports [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...Ngāti Porou (negotiating on behalf of certain hapū of Ngāti Porou) and Te Rūnanga o Te Whānau (negotiating on behalf of the hapū of Te Whānau a Apanui) since 2003. This dialogue resulted in the parties signing Terms of Negotiation in 2004 and Statements of Position and Intent in 2005. The dialogue has concerned how the Crown’s recognition of the ongoing and enduring mana (authority) of the hapū (sub-tribe or large extended family grouping) over the public foreshore and seabed c...

2. [2021] NZEmpC 149 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...and damage as a result of breaches of minimum entitlement provisions by the employer companies to the extent that those employer companies are unable to pay the wages or other money payable to the employees. [6] I have considered the Agreed Statement of Facts dated 31 August 2021 annexing a Schedule of Arrears, which lists the agreed arrears payable to each of the five aggrieved employees corresponding to breaches of minimum entitlements provisions listed in the Agreed Statement...

3. 06.-Evidence-of-Mr-Wayne-Kiriona-Ngati-Huia-Collective.PDF [PDF, 181 KB]

   ...Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource consent and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project By Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF WAYNE JOHN KIRIONA ON BEHALF OF NGĀTI HIKITANGA, NGĀTI HUIA KI MATAU, NGĀTI HUIA KI POROUTAWHAO, NGĀTI KIKOPIRI AND NGATI PARERAUKAWA IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION BY WAKA KOTAHI NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY...

4. OWRUG - M Curran - Supplementary - Planning - 14 May 2021 [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...Application of Objective 10A1.1 to dams 5. Two alternative versions of Objective 10A.1.1 were developed at expert conferencing. Both versions seek to capture activities that would compromise the long-term sustainable management of water if consented beyond an interim period (past 31 December 2025). Where they vary is in how the long-term environmental outcome is reflected. As stated in the JWS: 6. Version A incorporates earlier wording relating to long term sustainable manage...

5. Tahere v Tau - Rangihamama X3A and Omapere Taraire E (Aggregated) (2017) Māori Appellate Court MB 62 (2017 APPEAL 62) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...we believe that to be untrue and we remain of the view that His [Honour] had pre knowledge therefore a pre determined outcome 6. We believe that our land was placed into the Rangihamama X and Omapere Taraire E (Aggregated) without out tupuna consent. Our tupuna matua have also said our whenua should not be a part of this blocked and we as a whānau have not and cannot find/locate or recall any type or consent given for the amalgamation. 7. Given the treatment of our whānau durin...

6. ORC & Lower Waitaki Irrigation Company Ltd - EIC - Keri Johnston - 17 September 2021 [pdf, 763 KB]

   ...significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA AND IN THE MATTER of an application under section 149T of the RMA OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF KERI JOHNSTON ON BEHALF OF OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL AND LOWER WAITAKI IRRIGATION COMPANY LIMITED 17 September 2021 Applicant's Solicitor PO Box 4341 CHRISTCHURCH 8140 DX WX11179 Tel +64 3...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 072 McCallum Bros Limited v Manuhiri Kaitiaki Charitable Trust [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   ...appeal). [3] The strike out application is opposed by MKCT and other s274 parties to the McCallum Bros appeal. No party supports the McCallum Bros position but several simply abide the Court decision. Context [4] The original application for consent was refused at first instance. In the Environment Court, MKCT was one of the s 274 parties supporting the Council’s refusal and advancing evidence, particularly as to mana whenua effects.1 [5] The application for consent was not...

8. Wouldes v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409) & Ors [2017] NZREADT 36 [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...determined in their appeal, in that it challenges an assertion by Mr Tremain to the Committee that he was only aware of roof and structural issues in the complex to the extent of the information contained in the Body Corporate pre-contract disclosure statement (which did not include either the HBBC report or the Langley Twigg letter, or any other report). [11] They further submitted that the HBBC report was clearly the catalyst to a later “Specific Building Condition Survey” o...

9. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 WML rebuttal Jon Styles [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...306 2900 / 09 306 2901 Email: richard@brabant.co.nz/jeremy@brabant.co.nz Introduction 1. My full name is Jon Robert Styles. My qualifications and experience are set out in my Evidence in Chief (EIC) dated 29 April 2014. 2. This statement of rebuttal evidence has been prepared in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses. 3. This statement of rebuttal evidence has been prepared to respond to issues raised in the Joint Expert Witness Statement (Acous...

10. Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society [PDF, 487 KB]

    ...and Strategy. This approach fails to place any responsibility on those who can make the biggest impact on restoring and protecting the health and wellbeing of the Waikato River. d. The provisions that provide for non-notification of resource consents are not supported. 9. In addition to the relief sought in Table 1 Forest & Bird also seeks the following relief: a. Reduce the time frame for achieving; b. Delete all references to industry certified schemes; and c. Delete a...