Search Results

1. Rafiq v Civil Aviation Authority [2013] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...under the Privacy Act 1993. The proceedings in HRRT040/2011 cited the “Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand” as defendant while the proceedings in HRRT041/2011 cited the “Civil Aviation Authority of England operating in New Zealand”. The statements of claim are, in part, almost identical. Neither are models of clarity and are difficult to follow. They have been understood as making complaints that the defendants breached: [2.1] Principle 6 of the information privacy princip...

2. [2020] NZEnvC 109 Wellington Regional Council [pdf, 4.4 MB]

   ...following completion of the current mediation schedule) as to whether certain topics may need hearing time. The Council is directed to provide the Court with a report on that subject by 17 August 2020. Approach to future mediation Council Summary Statements [1 O] To date, the mediation process has involved the Council circulating summary statements at least 3 days prior to mediation. [11] Parties expressed appreciation of the Council summary statements breaking the mediation t...

3. [2020] NZEnvC 109 Wellington Regional Council [pdf, 4.4 MB]

   ...following completion of the current mediation schedule) as to whether certain topics may need hearing time. The Council is directed to provide the Court with a report on that subject by 17 August 2020. Approach to future mediation Council Summary Statements [1 O] To date, the mediation process has involved the Council circulating summary statements at least 3 days prior to mediation. [11] Parties expressed appreciation of the Council summary statements breaking the mediation t...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 231 Hurupaki Holdings Limited v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 966 KB]

   ...WHANGĀREI DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J A Smith sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Date of Order: 7 November 2022 Date of Issue: 7 November 2022 _________________________________________________________________ CONSENT DETERMINATION _________________________________________________________________ A: Under section 279(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991, the Environment Court, by consent, orders that: (1) the appeal is allowed subje...

5. [2021] NZEnvC 152 Kesteven Farm Ltd v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...20 September 2021. The reasons for the abatement notice were stated in the notice as:2 The taking of water for irrigation of a vineyard is not provided for as a permitted activity (or controlled or prohibited) and therefore requires a Resource Consent. A search of Council’s records shows that there is no Resource Consent in place permitting the activity. The activity is also not expressly allowed by a National Environmental Standard and is therefore a breach of Section 14(2) of...

6. [2023] NZEnvC 035 Aokautere Land Holdings Limited v Palmerston North City Council [pdf, 367 KB]

   ...activity. Residential development currently forms a node around and adjacent to the intersection of Johnstone Drive and Pacific Drive. Further residential development has been undertaken at the southern extent of Pacific Drive. In 2016 a resource consent (APP-2016200681.00) was granted to Aokautere Land Holdings Limited by Horizons Regional Council to undertake earthworks for creation of a road and to infill the gully within the land associated with residential development at Johnstone...

7. 2023-09-26-Evidence-of-Sean-Mallon.PDF [PDF, 1.2 MB]

   ...MATTER the direct referral of applications for resource consents and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project BY WAKA KOTAHI NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY Applicant STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF SEAN MALLON ON BEHALF OF KĀPITI COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL INTERCHANGE AT TAYLORS ROAD AND THE NEED FOR A SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE ARTERIAL CONNECTION IN THE VICINITY OF THE SOUTHERN INTERCHANGE Dated: 26 Septe...

8. Notice of Response and Affidavit in Support [pdf, 332 KB]

   ...arrangements you agree with and why • which of the proposed arrangements you do not agree with and why • which of the evidence provided about why the Order should be made that you agree with or don’t agree with (include the paragraph number of each statement from the original application) • are there any details said as evidence (safety issues, concerns for the child, incidences of family violence, or drug and alcohol issues) that you agree with or don’t agree with (include th...

9. Reekie v Corrections (Extension of Time) [2018] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Reekie in person Ms A Todd and Ms L Dittrich for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 24 April 2018 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL GRANTING DEFENDANT AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING STATEMENT OF REPLY1 [1] Regulation 15(1) of the Human Rights Review Tribunal Regulations 2002 provides that a defendant who intends to defend proceedings must, within 30 days after the day on which the notice of proceedings is served o...

10. [2013] NZCA 398 CA141/2013 Vulcan Steel Ltd v Wonnocott [pdf, 238 KB]

    ...____________________________________________________________________ REASONS OF THE COURT (Given by French J) Introduction [1] Vulcan Steel Ltd seeks leave to appeal against a decision of the Chief Judge of the Employment Court. Chief Judge Colgan found that Vulcan Steel had impliedly consented to Mr Wonnocott raising a personal grievance out of time. 1 1 Vulcan Steel Ltd v Wonnocott [2013] NZEmpC 15. [2] The...