Search Results

1. [2025] NZEmpC 163 Singh v Chand [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...compliance with the orders in the Authority determination by 18 February 2025. [17] The determination was not challenged. [18] On 27 March 2025 Mr Singh applied to the Court for urgency and abridgement of time to 14 clear days for the filing of a statement of defence to his claim pursuant to s 140(6). The application for urgency was declined in an interlocutory judgment of the Court dated 3 April 2025.8 The judgment records that Mr Chand was served with the statement of claim,...

2. [2015] NZEmpC 144 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...Mitchell, counsel for plaintiffs P Wicks QC, counsel for defendant Judgment: 17 August 2015 ORAL INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 3) OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] The plaintiffs have applied for leave to file and serve a second amended statement of claim in circumstances where the proceeding has been set down for hearing and is scheduled to commence a little less than two months hence. The defendant opposes the application for leave. [2] The proceeding was filed ur...

3. [2006] NZEmpC AC 54/06 Yuan Cheng International Investment Group Ltd v Buer [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...reference to the “last time in the Court” and “the Judge” were to the investigation in the Authority, as this matter had not been before a Court previously. His reference to an Auckland boyfriend is not mentioned at all in his written statements to the Authority and the Court, nor in the Authority’s determination and was not part of the challenge to any other aspects of the Authority’s awards. Because it was mentioned for the very first time, it appears, in Mr Lai’s...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 169 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in receivership) v Claxton [pdf, 518 KB]

   ...know why Mr Claxton was buying flooring products in her name. She did not discuss the subject with him and exercised no oversight of the account. She never went to the store to buy any flooring products from Smiths City. She did not get any statements from Smiths City about her account, although she acknowledged the company had her address when the account was opened. There was a PO box address on the account, but Mrs Douglas knew nothing about it. It transpired the PO box was...

5. [2007] NZEmpC AC 54/07 Panovski v Marine Trimmers and All Awnings 2004 Ltd [pdf, 18 KB]

   ...October 2007 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Glenn Finnigan, counsel for plaintiff Michael Robinson, counsel for defendant Judgment: 24 October 2007 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] The plaintiff has applied for leave to file his statement of claim out of time. His application was opposed by the defendant. The application was set down for hearing on 25 October 2007 as a defended matter. [2] The plaintiff had posted by mail, on 20 August 2007, a statement of claim...

6. [2014] NZEmpC 213 Hixon v Campbell and Ors substantive [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...July 2013, the company’s records show that its shareholders and directors were the first and second defendants with Mr Campbell holding 52 and Mr Eggers holding 48 of the company’s 100 shares. [10] On 6 August 2013 the liquidator refused to consent to the continuation of the proceedings in the Authority and after the company was removed from the Companies Register on 31 January 2014, the Labour Inspector’s proceedings against AHV were discontinued. [11] The current...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 182 Beresford v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...on the western part of the Site, is reserved. Directions are made for the appellants to confirm their position on whether or not they seek the above-noted reserved s293 directions. D: The making of any s293 directions to correct the Explanatory Statement to Ch 5 is reserved. Directions are made for QLDC to confer with parties and report on what is preferred. E: Costs are reserved and a timetable will be set if need be in due course (but not before a final decision issues)....

8. 2021-02-22 Special Advisor (Ian Gordon) - submission on Willowridge s 281 application [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...it is interested in. 1 Part 6AA RMA 7. Counsel for Willowridge submitted that, as a residential land developer, Willowridge has an interest in developing land and carrying out the requisite activities, including obtaining resource consents. Willowridge submitted that there is a consequential effect of this interest of Plan Rules that restrict residential development. In this way, Willowridge seeks to distinguish itself from persons with lesser interests, even those who...

9. Piper v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 408) & Ors [2017] NZREADT 32 [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...have the LIM so our property drop box is ready for sending to prospective clients. The time at which this email was sent to Ms Hotchin-Davies was not included on the copy of this email that was before the Committee, but Ms Hotchin-Davies’ statement to the Authority’s investigator that she was told that the LIM came in after the Open Home, and before her visit to the Agency on 10 August (as set out at [e], below), was not contested. [e] Ms Hotchin-Davies went to the Agency at...

10. Tesar v REAA CAC 20004 & Ors [2014] NZREADT 18 [pdf, 54 KB]

    ...complainants. [3] On viewing the property, the complainants were concerned that a wood-burner installed at the property might not be properly permitted. [4] On 3 May 2010, the licensee sent an email to the vendors of the property asking their consent to her (as agent) or the purchasers applying for a certificate of acceptance and building consent, if required, for the wood burner currently located at the property. [5] The vendors emailed back that day giving the licensee permissio...