Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Dangen [2019] NZLCDT 22 [pdf, 502 KB]

   ...(Mrs KB)”; and • “At this stage I do not envisage any expenses that are likely to be incurred in managing (Mrs KB’s) property”; and 5 • “I confirm that I am aware of my responsibilities to prepare and file in the Court statements containing prescribed particulars as referred to in Section 45 of the Act as to (Mrs KB’s) property …”. And the relevant statutory periods are then set out after that statement. [15] Ms Dangen was asked to swear the affidavit...

2. ENVC-16 notice of appeal on decision concerning resource consent, transfer of water or discharge permit, certificate of compliance or esplanade strip [docx, 25 KB]

   ...DLM237795][bookmark: DLM196479][bookmark: DLM3134127][bookmark: DLM378556]Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure) Regulations 2003 (as at 03 March 2015) Form 16 Notice to Environment Court of appeal on decision on application concerning resource consent, transfer of water permit or discharge permit, certificate of compliance, or esplanade strip [bookmark: DLM235220][bookmark: DLM235254][bookmark: DLM235265][bookmark: DLM235268][bookmark: DLM235278][bookmark: DLM237263]Sections 121, 12...

3. [2014] NZEmpC 213 Hixon v Campbell and Ors substantive [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...July 2013, the company’s records show that its shareholders and directors were the first and second defendants with Mr Campbell holding 52 and Mr Eggers holding 48 of the company’s 100 shares. [10] On 6 August 2013 the liquidator refused to consent to the continuation of the proceedings in the Authority and after the company was removed from the Companies Register on 31 January 2014, the Labour Inspector’s proceedings against AHV were discontinued. [11] The current...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 182 Beresford v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...on the western part of the Site, is reserved. Directions are made for the appellants to confirm their position on whether or not they seek the above-noted reserved s293 directions. D: The making of any s293 directions to correct the Explanatory Statement to Ch 5 is reserved. Directions are made for QLDC to confer with parties and report on what is preferred. E: Costs are reserved and a timetable will be set if need be in due course (but not before a final decision issues)....

5. [2025] NZEmpC 163 Singh v Chand [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...compliance with the orders in the Authority determination by 18 February 2025. [17] The determination was not challenged. [18] On 27 March 2025 Mr Singh applied to the Court for urgency and abridgement of time to 14 clear days for the filing of a statement of defence to his claim pursuant to s 140(6). The application for urgency was declined in an interlocutory judgment of the Court dated 3 April 2025.8 The judgment records that Mr Chand was served with the statement of claim,...

6. Guidelines - How to make an appeal [pdf, 318 KB]

   ...2018, reg 249(3). 5 [9] TELEPHONE CALL 9.1. After receiving a Notice of Appeal, the Authority will schedule a telephone call with all the parties to identify the issue in the appeal. The parties must attend the call unless the Authority consents to their non-attendance. 9.2. It is expected that the telephone call will take approximately 30 minutes. 9.3. The purpose of the telephone call is to clarify the issues to be determined in the appeal and set a timetable for filing...

7. [2021] NZEmpC 169 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in receivership) v Claxton [pdf, 518 KB]

   ...know why Mr Claxton was buying flooring products in her name. She did not discuss the subject with him and exercised no oversight of the account. She never went to the store to buy any flooring products from Smiths City. She did not get any statements from Smiths City about her account, although she acknowledged the company had her address when the account was opened. There was a PO box address on the account, but Mrs Douglas knew nothing about it. It transpired the PO box was...

8. [2006] NZEmpC AC 54/06 Yuan Cheng International Investment Group Ltd v Buer [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...reference to the “last time in the Court” and “the Judge” were to the investigation in the Authority, as this matter had not been before a Court previously. His reference to an Auckland boyfriend is not mentioned at all in his written statements to the Authority and the Court, nor in the Authority’s determination and was not part of the challenge to any other aspects of the Authority’s awards. Because it was mentioned for the very first time, it appears, in Mr Lai’s...

9. Pullar - Aperahama Sullivan whānau Trust (2017) 61 Takitimu MB 45 (61 TKT 45) [pdf, 439 KB]

   ...received from the trustees. Counsel for the applicant confirmed that the accounts for 2008, 2009 and 2010 had been provided to the trustees and each of them was to review the accounts before they could be finalised. The applicant was waiting on visa statements and bank statements belonging to Nan Sullivan to be provided to her in order that she could review them alongside the accounts. Counsel explained that the trustees had paid their mother Nan Sullivan’s credit card bills....

10. Piper v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 408) & Ors [2017] NZREADT 32 [pdf, 239 KB]

    ...have the LIM so our property drop box is ready for sending to prospective clients. The time at which this email was sent to Ms Hotchin-Davies was not included on the copy of this email that was before the Committee, but Ms Hotchin-Davies’ statement to the Authority’s investigator that she was told that the LIM came in after the Open Home, and before her visit to the Agency on 10 August (as set out at [e], below), was not contested. [e] Ms Hotchin-Davies went to the Agency at...