5272 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2018-AKL-000078 AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of direct referral of an application for resource consent for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America’s Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent
...Telephone: (09) 916 9091 https://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/going-to-court/pre/interpreters-language-and-disability-access/ http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/environment-court SCHEDULE OF PROCEEDINGS Appeals against a decision on applications for consent to construct & operate a regional landfill facility at 1232 State Highway 1, Wayby Valley, between Wellsford & Warkworth (Wayby Valley), Auckland ENV-2021-304-000041 Te Runanga O Ngati Whatua v Auckland Council Ro...
Page 1 EXPERT WITNESS CONFERENCING In the matter: of a direct referral application under section 87G of the Resource Management Act 1991 for resource consents for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America’s Cup in Auckland Applicant: Panuku Development Auckland ENV-AKL-2018-000078 Topic: Urban Design and Landscape Architecture Date: 7th August 2018 Meetings held: 26th July 2018 (Environment Court, Federal Street); 30th July 201
...for leave on 16 June 2010 following e-mailed receipt of the papers by the registry on the previous day. Mr Behan-Kitto’s application for leave to challenge out of time was accompanied by an affidavit explaining the circumstances and a draft statement of claim. [3] The statutory period for challenging determinations of the Authority by right is 28 days from the date of its determinations. The delay in this case between its expiry and the application to the Court was almost thre...
...alternatives by all of the parties. To some extent these signal the essential attributes of any proposal that would be appropriate and acceptable. We are in a quandary as to the outcome in this case, particularly whether there may be a clearly consentable proposal. We decide these issues in our conclusion later in the decision. The Area The appellant, particularly through its director, has acquired a number of sites in and around the Mission Bay Centre over the past few dec...
...alternatives by all of the parties. To some extent these signal the essential attributes of any proposal that would be appropriate and acceptable. We are in a quandary as to the outcome in this case, particularly whether there may be a clearly consentable proposal. We decide these issues in our conclusion later in the decision. The Area The appellant, particularly through its director, has acquired a number of sites in and around the Mission Bay Centre over the past few dec...
...with this contention.6 [12] By this stage, Mr Lorigan was self-represented. Because it was apparent that he would have difficulty in re-pleading the removed matters, and on the acquiescence of Mr Towner, counsel for Infinity, I ruled that the statements of problems and statements of reply regarding the proceedings in the Authority would now be pleadings in this Court.7 [13] For some time, the Court had been attempting to resolve interlocutory applications regarding the challenge...
...Attachment. Changes proposed to PC7 by Aotearoa New Zealand Fine Wine Estates Limited Partnership 1. Amend Policy 10A.2.1 as follows: 10A.2.1 Irrespective of any other policies in this Plan, avoid granting resource consents that replace deemed permits, or water permits to take and use surface water (including groundwater considered as surface water under policy 6.4.1A (a), (b) and (c) of this Plan) where those water permits expire prior to 31 December 20
...Attachment. Changes proposed to PC7 by Aotearoa New Zealand Fine Wine Estates Limited Partnership 1. Amend Policy 10A.2.1 as follows: 10A.2.1 Irrespective of any other policies in this Plan, avoid granting resource consents that replace deemed permits, or water permits to take and use surface water (including groundwater considered as surface water under policy 6.4.1A (a), (b) and (c) of this Plan) where those water permits expire prior to 31 December 20
...Aotearoa Hotel Sector • Ernst & Young, and • Wellington Phoenix FC. 3. These parties do not intend to call expert evidence (though they may adopt and rely on the expert evidence of others). However, their submissions comprise both statements of fact (about their respective industry or enterprise, and the significance of air travel to them) and statements of position (about their support for the project). It may be appropriate for the former to be provided to the Cou...