Search Results

1. Ikbarieh v Hammadieh [2014] NZIACDT 49 (15 April 2014) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...prospect of selection, and charged fair and reasonable fees, using the appropriate process. [7] The Tribunal has to determine whether the adviser gave adequate advice, and whether he could justify the fees and the process for setting them. The Statement of Complaint [8] The Registrar filed an amended Statement of Complaint dated 14 February 2014. [9] It records the complainant lodged the complaint on wider grounds, but the Registrar identified material supporting three aspects: [9....

2. [2018] NZEnvC 164 Bernie v Auckland Council [pdf, 6.5 MB]

   ...Zealand, there is an expectation (depending on the width) of at least some 1,000-2,000 vehicle movements per day (vrnpd) upon them. [33] In Norsho Bulc Ltd v Auckland CounciP the Court considered the use of Public roads in the context of a resource consent. At paragraph [95]-[96], the Court stated: 10 [95] We note that the use of roads is a permitted activity under the Auckland Unitary Plan.3 There was no discussion of this activity status before us, perhaps because the rule may...

3. [2020] NZIACDT 46 - ZG v Parker (19 October 2020) [pdf, 357 KB]

   ...disclosure (17 March 2017); Registrar’s documents at 174. 4 Director’s text to the complainant (2 May 2018); Registrar’s documents at 94. 5 Mr Parker’s affirmation (30 May 2019) at [41]. 6 Mr Parker says the file note is wrongly dated 5 March 2017; statement of Mr Parker (11 September 2020) at [6]. 4 acknowledging that Mr Parker had disclosed a “personal and familial relationship” with the employer, as well as his voluntary work there as the payroll officer. [15] T...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 136 West Coast Regional Council v Westland District Council [pdf, 535 KB]

   ...AND WAIVER DECISION 2 [2] Order A(e) ordered that the District Council, by 3 August 2018, send a copy of the Final Design for the wastewater treatment plant, together with the Wastewater Treatment Plant Specifications and a copy of the Design Statement, to the Regional Council and the court. (3] At the time of filing on 3 August 2018, the District Council failed to provide a complete Design Statement as defined in Order 8(b) of the decision . The explanation offered by counsel...

5. E87 Fiona Knox – Corporate – RE – Applicant [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Robyn Knox. I have prepared a primary statement of evidence dated 7 August 20181, and confirm my qualifications and experience as set out in paragraphs 1.1 to 1.5 of that evidence. 2. SCOPE OF REBUTTAL EVIDENCE 2.1 I have reviewed the following statements of evidence: a) Keith Ingram on behalf of the Tug William C Daldy Preservation Society dated 22 August 2018;2 b) On behalf of Mana Whenua in support: i. Ngarimu Blair dated 28 August 2018;3 ii. Professor David Williams dated...

6. Wihelmus Hooft van Huijsduijnen v Woodley [2012] NZWHT Auckland 11 [pdf, 451 KB]

   ...57 Removal of architect ........................................................................................... 58 Lack of Council records ...................................................................................... 59 Issuing the consent ............................................................................................. 60 Inspections and code compliance .......................................................................... 61 Quality of inspections .........

7. [2023] NZEnvC 009 Hankinson v Central Otago District Council [pdf, 849 KB]

   ...under s120 of the Act STEPHANIE & JONOTHAN HANKINSON (ENV-2022-CHC-40) Appellants CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan - sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Consent Order: 30 January 2023 CONSENT ORDER A: Under s279(1)(b) of the RNIA,1 the Environment Court, by consent, orders that: (1) the appeal is allowed to the extent that resource consent is granted to undertake a two-lot rural subdivisio...

8. Director of Proceedings v Nelson Marlborough District Health Board [2014] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...[1] These proceedings under s 50 of the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 28 January 2014. [2] Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal has now been asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: 2 [2.1] A Consent Memorandum dated 18 December 2013. [2.2] An Agreed Summary of Facts, a copy of which is annexed and marked “A”. [3] The Consent Memorandum is in the following terms:...

9. 2020-09-16-EPA-PC7-Summary-of-Submissions-Report.pdf [pdf, 529 KB]

   ...4. Key themes in submissions A number of key themes are recurrent in submissions on Plan Change 7 as identified below:  Opposition to the entire plan change and requests for it to be withdrawn completely  Opposition to a six year term of consent for replacement consents for existing water takes and for new water take consents  Opposition to Policy 10A.2.1 that existing water takes will not be granted consent unless the irrigated area is not increased and there is a reductio...

10. [2022] NZEnvC 025 Greater Wellington Regional Council v Adams [pdf, 2.3 MB]

    ...wetlands where buildings or earthworks are not allowed. Effluent disposal systems and facilities on lots 6 and 7 must be located clear of the areas Y and Z; • In addition to the above controls on lots 6 and 7 all of the lots are subject to Consent Notice 11728473.4 (the Consent Notice) incorporating a 5 range of requirements/restrictions as to building development and wetland protection, wastewater systems, water supply and telecommunications. [4] Although not apparent fro...