Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 105 KB]
...Body Corporate was therefore declined. Summary of Facts 1998: Parklane divided the land into two sites and had two built units on each. Units 2A and 2B were on one, while units 2C and 2D were on the other. Although the two sites had separate consent numbers, both projects were undertaken at much the same time and were treated as one. The subject dwelling is Unit 2C 1 Dec 1998: Mr Liu (sixth respondent now removed) applied to the Council for a building consent for two new houses...