Search Results

1. Maori Trustee v Hanford - Ohiro 19 and 21 Block 10 (Polhill Gully) (2006) 165 Aotea MB 131 (165 AOT 131) [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...merely because of the fact the parties in their agreement seek that outcome. The Maori Trustee has correctly, in my view, framed his applications to include a change of status, which has been notified. 1 am also satisfied, therefore, that the obiter statements in the Bruce and Edwards line of authorities as to notice to preferred class have been complied with. There can be no doubt that without a status change the applications' intent in the interests of the owners will fail. 1 am, h...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 156 New Zealand Steel Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 830 KB]

   NZ Steel Ltd v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 156 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND STEEL LIMITED (ENV-2023-AKL-000042) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Alternate Environment Judge L J Newhook sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Last case event: Joint memorandum and amended consent memorandum date

3. Ms L v REAA Registrar [2013] NZREADT 47 [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...Anor [2005] 2 NZLR 597. In Westfield the Court considered s.93 of the Resource Management Act 1991, which required the Council to be satisfied it had received adequate information to make a decision about notification of applications for resource consent. Section 94(2) of the Resource Management Act 1991 provided that the Council was not required to notify an application if, among other things, it was “satisfied that the adverse effect on the environment of the activity for which conse...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 026 Nelson City Council [pdf, 515 KB]

   ...driving vehicles across to launch and retrieve recreational boats/fishing vessels at the water’s edge is not a Permitted Activity under Rule CMr.33 of the Nelson Resource Management Plan (Plan), and therefore, the activity requires resource consent. (2) The beach area at Delaware Bay (shown on Plan A attached), below MHWS, which is used to launch and retrieve recreational boats/fishing vessels, is not a launching ramp under Rule CMr.33(d) of the Plan. B: Costs are to lie whe...

5. [2013] NZREADT 62 – REAA v Clark (23 July 2013) [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...cancelled by the vendor on 7 December 2010 but, on 10 January 2011, the complainant started further negotiations over the section with Astrid Clark and a second sale and purchase agreement was signed on 12 January 2011. [29] The complainant needed the consent of neighbours in order to build on the site but Karen Clark emailed the complainant on 28 January 2011 informing her that a beneficiary and fellow trustee were unhappy with her proposed site plan. [30] An email of 31 January 20...

6. [2017] NZEnvC 073 Ngai Te Hapu Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 28 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 073 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN NGAI TE HAPO INCORPORATED (ENV-2016-AKL-42) NGA POTIKI A TAMAPAHORE TRUST (ENV-2016-AKL-4S) Appellants AND BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent AND ASTROLABE COMMUNITY TRUST Applicant Court: Environment Judge JA Smith Alternate Environment Judge CE Fox Environment Commissioner SK Prime Environment Commiss

7. [2017] NZEnvC 073 Ngai Te Hapu Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 28 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 073 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN NGAI TE HAPO INCORPORATED (ENV-2016-AKL-42) NGA POTIKI A TAMAPAHORE TRUST (ENV-2016-AKL-4S) Appellants AND BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent AND ASTROLABE COMMUNITY TRUST Applicant Court: Environment Judge JA Smith Alternate Environment Judge CE Fox Environment Commissioner SK Prime Environment Commiss

8. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Sensible Sentencing Group Trust (Change of Venue) [2014] NZHRRT 25 [pdf, 49 KB]

   ...further advises that it is understood that the Victims, who are based in Christchurch, consent to a hearing being held in Wellington instead of Auckland. [12] For the Director the following submissions are made: [12.1] From the outset the SSGT has consented to Auckland as the venue. All that has changed is that the defendant now has Wellington instead of Auckland counsel. That choice was made by the SSGT knowing the venue is Auckland. Ms Pender accepted the brief in full knowledge th...

9. PSPLA - Form J: Add or remove class company licence [pdf, 516 KB]

   ...Company details What is your name? Company registered name Company registration number Please provide the contact details of the person the Licensing Authority can contact regarding this application: Full nameFull name Phone Day Mobile Email I consent to being contacted regarding my application at this email address  Yes  No * If you are removing a class(es) of business move on to Step 8. If you are adding a class of business, please continue with the application below. Step...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 001 Havelock Village Limited v Waikato District Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

    ...Court: Environment Judge S M Tepania sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Last case event: 30 November 2023 Date of Order: 16 January 2024 Date of Issue: 16 January 2024 _________________________________________________________________ CONSENT DETERMINATION _________________________________________________________________ 2 A: Under section 279(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991, the Environment Court, by consent, orders that: (1) the relevant chapters in...