Search Results

1. Tito - Mangakahia 2B2 No 2A1A [2016] Chief Judge's MB 398 (2016 CJ 398) [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...supported his s 45 application with submissions contending an omission in the presentation of the facts to the Court in relation to the 1998 order constituting the ahu whenua trust over the Mangakahia block. The applicant claims that, when giving her consent to the establishment of the ahu whenua trust, his mother Winifred Tito did not advise the Court that she only held a life interest in her shares of the block (to which the applicant is entitled in remainder) and that the applicant...

2. 2020-02-19 Richard Allibone Reply [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...populations from salmonid populations that are present downstream and/or upstream of the abstraction. For example, I worked with the Otago Conservancy staff in 2000 and 2001 when we considered Trustpower and Dunedin City Council’s water abstraction consents from the Deep Stream catchment. The Department of Conservation sought no residual flows at the take points so the lack of flow downstream of the abstraction reinforced fish passage barriers that prevented trout access to th...

3. Gray v Tulip Holdings Ltd [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...property developer. THL was previously named Buildcorp Holdings Limited and has been named THL since 29 October 2002. [4] The Second respondent, North Shore City Council (the Council), is the Local Authority responsible for issuing the Building Consent and Code Compliance Certificate for the owners’ dwellinghouse. [5] The Third respondent, James Michael Fairgray is a builder [6] The Fourth respondent, Richard Arthur Zgierski-Boreyko, carries on business as a draughts...

4. Miller-Hard v Stewart [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...of all the witnesses. Evidence was given under oath of affirmation by the following: • Greg Miller-Hard, called by the Claimant; • Kerry Murphy, a building consultant, called by the Claimant; • Grant Honeyfield (affidavit admitted by consent), for the Claimant; • Nicole Miller-Hard; • Geoffrey Morrison, a carpenter involved on the original building, called by myself; Claim No 00765 – Miller-Hard

5. Insley v Insley - Awanui Haparapara No 4B (2019) 211 Waiāriki MB 68 (211 WAR 68) [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...application, submitting that all three trustees wished to withdraw their resignations. A cross-application was filed by the respondents, seeking the removal of Lionel Huritu and Karama Insley. Both applications have since been withdrawn with consent by all parties and dismissed accordingly.4 [10] On 19 June 2018, counsel for the respondents sent a letter to Ms Wara, the applicants’ counsel, advising that the respondents wished to remain as trustees and they had in fact withdraw...

6. [2024] NZEnvC 162 Te Kauri Marae Trust v Waikato District Council [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   Te Kauri Marae Trust v Waikato District Council & Waikato Regional Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 162 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 120 the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN TE KAURI MARAE TRUST (ENV-2023-AKL-000052) Appellant AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL First Respondent AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Second Respondent AND GLEESON MANAGED FILL LIMITED Applicant

7. ENVC Matiatia party corresp costs Direction Matiatia Ltd 201601 [pdf, 316 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV-2014-AKL-0000174 IN THE MATTER of an application by direct referral under section 87G of the Resource Management Act 1991 (Act) by WAIHEKE MARINAS LIMITED for resource consents to construct and operate a 160 berth marina in Matiatia Bay, Waiheke Island APPLICATION FOR COSTS BY DIRECTION MATIATIA INCORPORATED 21 January 2015 Solicitor Acting: J K Garnett Whaley Garnett PO Box...

8. Edwards v Winitana - Matera Ahu Whenua Trust (2017) 165 Waiariki MB 88 (165 WAR 88) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...justice that Mr Winitana be removed from the proceedings. [9] Counsel further submits that to continue to include Mr Winitana in these proceedings is an unnecessary expense for both the Court and Mr Winitana. Ms Zwaan adds that if the Court does not consent to Mr Winitana’s removal he will be seeking costs against the applicant in this matter. [10] In addition Ms Zwaan submits that Mr Winitana was involved in the set up of the farm development of Matera block. He sought and was...

9. BORA Maritime Transport Amendment Bill [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...any one or more of a DAMP operator’s safety-sensitive workers at any reasonable time and in any reasonable circumstances the Director considers appropriate (‘Director testing’). 8. Both operator and Director testing require the worker’s consent. 5 If a worker refuses to consent, or if he or she fails the test, the DAMP operator must stand the worker down from performing safety-sensitive activities until they are able to perform them safely, and implement the response plan in t...

10. 2021-12-17 John Cocks - Memo - re Chapter 7 (Landfills) [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    ...developed. SCOPE OF PC1 13. Guidance on the scope of PC1 is provided in the ORC fact sheet (see Attachment) and the introduction in PC1. Neither the scope nor the purpose of PC1 is stated in these documents. 14. The fact sheet includes a statement that All landfills would require a resource consent. 15. PC1 Rule 7.6.1 excludes Cleanfill landfills and Greenwaste landfills. Under the Guidelines, a Cleanfill landfill is either a Class 3, 4 or 5 landfill, and a Greenwaste landfi...