Search Results

1. [2021] NZEmpC 166 Yakka Contracting Ltd v Naicker [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...from dealing with his bank accounts but he was ordered to disclose 2 Yakka Contracting Ltd v Amrita Naickers Ltd HC Auckland CIV-2021-404-1297, 16 July 2021 (Minute of Fitzgerald J). details of those accounts and provide copies of bank statements for each bank account dating from February 2020. [9] As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in FMV v TZB,3 and as already noted above, Yakka intends to withdraw the claims against Mr Naicker that currently form part of t...

2. LCRO 148/2020 PV v GY (31 May 2021) [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...RS was charged with assault in a family relationship under s 194 of the Crimes Act 1961. Ms PV was assigned to represent Mr RS on the assault charge. [8] Ms CB did not wish to pursue charges against her partner. She declined to make a written statement. She made request of the Police for the charges to be withdrawn. [9] On 16 April 2019, Ms CB texted Ms PV. Ms PV says that she assumed that Mr RS had provided Ms CB with her contact details. [10] In that text, Ms CB said this: Hi...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 107 Zespri International Ltd v Yu interlocutory [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...not the end of the matter because Mr Yu has now proposed a methodology which he says will address properly disputed questions of privilege of documents that may be contained on the laptop. [31] Mr Yu’s proposal is set out as Schedule A to his statement of defence filed on 1 April 2015. It should speak for itself as follows: 1. The defendant is ordered to deliver up the laptop to the plaintiff subject to the following terms and conditions: (a) Plaintiff and defendant are to join...

4. Regulatory Impact Statement: Improving security so that people feel safer in courts [pdf, 411 KB]

   Regulatory Impact Statement - Improving security so that people feel safer in courts Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry). This RIS examines proposals to extend Court Security Officers’ (CSOs) existing powers to deny entry to, remove, or detain people in order to better address low level offending and disruptive behaviour in courts. (Judges will retain control of security in their c...

5. Hay v Dodds [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...Terrace, Milford, in October 2001, from a Mr and Mrs Aldridge. The Owners are the fourth owners of this house. 2.2 The First Respondent is Mr Dodds, the architect who designed the house in late 1993, and prepared the documents for the building consent which was issued in January 1994. Mr Dodds did not supervise the construction work. 2.3 The Second Respondent is Mr Lee, who it is alleged was the person responsible for the development and construction of the dwelling. It app...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 241 Albert Road Investments Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   ...order is enforceable at the Auckland District Court (if necessary). REASONS Introduction [1 J This proceeding concerns an appeal by Albert Road Investments Limited against a decision of the Auckland Council, declining a non-complying activity consent for a two­ lot subdivision at 102 Hudson Road, Warkworth. Albert Road v AC - Costs Decision 2 [2] In an Interim Decision' the court reserved its final determination but indicated that it was satisfied that the proposal woul...

7. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 WML evidence chief Maxwell Dunn annex [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...Schedule of Sites and Places of Value to Mana Whenua - Item ID 1730 – Archaeology of Maori origin - Matiatia Bay Historic Reserve 3. Reasons for Submission Our submission is: a) Waiheke Marina’s Ltd (WML) have lodged resource consent applications with the Council for a marina in Matiatia Bay. The applications are also the subject of a direct referral to the Environment Court. The Court has recently advised that a hearing of the applications and submissions is bei...

8. [2021] NZREADT 18 - Brady (28 April 2021) [pdf, 338 KB]

   ...Brady is the sole director and a 50 percent shareholder, pursuant to which Marmitmor became the purchaser of the property. Marmitmor’s purchase of the property was settled on 4 April 2018. [f] Mr Brady did not obtain the vendors’ informed consent in the prescribed form for Marmitmor to become the purchaser of the property, as is required by s 134 of the Act, and did not provide the vendors with an independent valuation of the property, as is required by s 135 of the Act. [...

9. 2021-03-14 Tom De Pelsemaeker - Supplementary Appendix 2 [pdf, 307 KB]

   ...water permits where metering is not required by condition of resource consent or by the Resource Management (Measuring and Reporting of Water Takes) Regulations 2010, the rate of take and the volume of water sought is no more than the existing consented instantaneous rate of take and volumes.23 The Council reserves control over the following matters: (a) Intake method and flow rate controls to avoid or mitigate fish entrainment; and24 (ba) In accordance with historic use an...

10. [2019] NZEmpC 139 Zara’s Turkish Ltd v Kocaturk [pdf, 372 KB]

    ...Ltd. That was the name of their employer they gave when completing the statement of problem. That name, or combinations of it such as “Zara’s Turkish” or “Zara’s”, appeared on business records they had access to including on bank statements showing direct payments of wages into their bank account. [33] Several affidavits were filed dealing with interlocutory steps in these proceedings where Mr and Mrs Kocatürk referred to “Zara’s Turkish” as their employer. A...