Search Results

1. Tuhaka v Samuels - Succession to Kahukuranui Piwari [2025] Chief Judge's MB 728 (2025 CJ 728) [pdf, 586 KB]

   ...Kohukuranui Piwari 0.5007 12 Ohuanga North 5A Part Kohukuranui Piwari 0.022688 13 Aorangi (Awarua) Kohukuranui Piwari 0.2143 14 Rotokakahi Kohukuranui Piwari 0.00377 15 Ruamata Kohukuranui Piwari 0.053571 16 Lake Rotoaira Kohukuranui Piwari 0.05175 Consents are on the file from all the children of the deceased stating that they wish the interests their mother received from her second husband Albert Nuku Piwari to be vested back to his children. Albert Nuku Piwari or Nuku Piwar...

2. MacGregor v Craig (Application for Witness Summonses) [2015] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...shall be convicted of an offence against subsection (1) unless there was tendered or paid to that person travelling expenses in accordance with section 111. The defendant’s application [4] Following the filing by the parties of their witness statements (including “will say” statements) the Secretary of the Tribunal by email dated Tuesday 17 November 2015 gave notice that any application for a witness summons was to be filed no later than 5pm on Wednesday 18 November 2015 to e...

3. Ruka - Rangihamama X3A and Omapere Taraire E (2007) 114 Whangarei MB 172 (114 WH 172) [pdf, 6.2 MB]

   ...the early 1990s. Since I June 2006 Rangihamama (excluding some areas) has been leased for 5 years to the Merv Pinny Personal Trust at an annual rental of $130,000.00 plus GST and outgoings. [5) Over the years the trust has filed its financial statements with the COUlt in accordance with its obligations under its trust order. Although the interests in the two main blocks were aggregated by order of the Court on 6 May 1987, separate financial statements are prepared for the two block...

4. Wall v Malone [2010] NZWHT Auckland 21 [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...47 Claim against Mrs Malone in Tort ............................................................. 52 Claim against Mrs Malone in Contract ...................................................... 59 RESPONSIBILITY OF COUNCIL IN ISSUING THE BUILDING CONSENT AND IN ITS INSPECTION PROCESS ......................................................... 75 Issuing the Building Consent..................................................................... 76 Inspections ................................

5. Smith v Smith - Waipaoa 5A2 and other lands (2017) 64 Tairawhiti MB 270 (64 TRW 270) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...Court to undertake such review and be available for questioning by the parties and their counsel. [23] A judicial conference will be convened in early February 2017 to enable the trustees and counsel to provide updates as to progress. [2] By consent the parties also agreed to each nominate two trustees to serve alongside Mr Hemana to administer the estate. Consistent with the orders set out above and in particular paragraph [23], earlier today I convened a judicial conference for t...

6. Fredricsen v Hikuwai - Wainui D Block (2016) 143 Taitokerau MB 135 (143 TTK 135) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...relation to Wainui D block. The applicant, Ms Raiha Fredricsen, claims that the respondent, Mr Eric Hikuwai, who is one of the owners of the block, has entered into an arrangement with a third party for beehives to be placed on the land without the consent of the other owners. She argues that Mr Hikuwai, as a minority shareholder, has no ability to enter into such arrangements on behalf of all the owners and any such agreement is invalid and fraudulent. She therefore seeks an inj...

7. Complaints Assessment Committee 403 v Zhang [2018] NZREADT 30 [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...with” $590,000 for the section. Mr Zhang knew of a possible interested purchaser, Mr Yan (an “existing client”) and contacted him. Mr Zhang provided Mr Yan with information given to him by Mr Drever (including a printed copy of a resource consent, and draft plans for building consent) and suggested Mr Yan should view the property and undertake some due diligence. [7] Mr Zhang met Mr Yan later the same evening, and after discussion between them, Mr Yan signed an agree...

8. [2019] NZEnvC 005 The New Zealand Heavy Haulage Association Incorporated (Huose Movers Section) v South Tarnakai District Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...certification to maintain and enhance amenity values. • Assessment of environmental effects through the resource consent process for proposals that are not permitted, because of non-compliance with performance standards. Use of conditions on resource consents to control the effects of relocated buildings. • The provisions of the Building Act 2004 and New Zealand Building Code to manage the structural integrity and habitable and occupancy requirements for relocated buildings. Sec...

9. Cations v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) [2018] NZREADT 66 [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...r 9.6 was unsatisfactory conduct. Property B [7] The Committee found that Mr Cations had made changes to an agreement for sale and purchase (“the agreement”) after the vendor and purchaser had signed it. The Committee noted Mr Cations’ statement that he had written the agreement for Property B afresh, believing it would be easier to understand and clearer. The Committee found that when he re-drafted the agreement, Mr Cations made an error in recording the deposit amount as b...

10. Dunworth v McLachlan [2010] NZWHT Auckland 6 [pdf, 89 KB]

    ...art or a label for ready identification”, unlike a local authority builder, architect or engineer. He regarded the term as “a loose description, applied to the legal entity which by virtue of its ownership of the company and control of the consent, design, construction, approval and marketing process qualified for the imposition of liability in appropriate circumstances”. It is the function carried out by a person or entity that gives rise to the reasons for imposing a duty...