ND v VC LCRO 7 / 2012 (15 June 2012) [pdf, 74 KB]
...... is a total falsehood, I was never in contravention of this Act and interesting enough this Act was not even mentioned at the Disputes Tribunal hearing, by his client (A).” [6] He objected strongly to the Practitioner making false, groundless statements about his professional operations which had no substance, and making a threat. The Applicant said he felt sickened when he read the Practitioner’s comments and felt shocked that the matter might be referred to the Ministry when...