[2023] NZEmpC 94 Soapi v Pick Hawke’s Bay Inc [pdf, 255 KB]
...they disagreed with him but they had not. [27] The thrust of Mr Evans’ evidence was that almost all the plaintiffs’ claims are answered in one way or another through: (a) the approvals granted by INZ; or (b) because the deductions were consented to by the plaintiffs; or (c) the amounts involved were very small and capable of resolution without litigation. [28] Mr Bates submitted that the plaintiffs’ claims fall into four categories: (a) Category 1: deductions...