Taueki v Horowhenua District Council – Horowhenua (11) Lake (2012) 294 Aotea MB 236 (294 AOT 236) [pdf, 260 KB]
...use the buildings was that there were no ablution facilities. Added to that is the evidence of Mr Roxburgh who stated that a reason for the refusal was because one of the buildings was undergoing major refurbishment. But contrast that with the statements of Mr Brown who said that the repairs were of a much more limited nature. Curiously Mr Roxburgh could not give any details as to the costs involved in the repairs other than to acknowledge that it was likely to be the HDC who wer...