Search Results

1. Proactive-release-Better-Outcomes-for-Victims-Work-Programme_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...sexual connection with a child (defined in s132(6)(a) as a person under the age of 12 years) and carries a maximum penalty of 14 years’ imprisonment. Section 132(5) also states that it is not a defence to a charge under that section that a child consented to the sexual activity. 57 However, data shows the rape of, or unlawful sexual connection with, a child is typically charged as a sexual violation under s128B of the Crimes Act 1961, primarily because the offence carries a maximum pen...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 238 Coast Road Resilience Group Inc v West Coast Regional Council [pdf, 3.9 MB]

   CRRG v WCRC & GDC – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 238 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN COAST ROAD RESILIENCE GROUP INCORPORATED (ENV-2024-CHC-41) Appellant AND WEST COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL First Respondent AND GREY DISTRICT COUNCIL Second Respondent Environment Judge P A Steven – sitting alone under s279

3. [2012] NZEmpC 52 Maritime Union of NZ Inc v Ports of Auckland [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...separate injunctions. The first relates to proposals that were made by the defendant which appeared on their face to lead to the possibility of redundancies. These I describe as the “contracting out” injunctions. [2] The defendant has consented to the injunctions sought under this head for a limited period and I will set out shortly the terms of those injunctions. For reasons which I will need to give in writing, I will indicate why I am satisfied that the Court does have...

4. Memorandum of Counsel for Wellington International Airport Limited 19 December 2016 [pdf, 175 KB]

   Before the Environment Court at Wellington In the Matter of section 87G of the Resource Management Act 1991 And In the Matter of the direct referral of an application for resource consents associated with an extension to the runway by Wellington International Airport Limited (ENV-2016-WLG-00058) Memorandum of Counsel for Wellington International Airport Limited Lane Neave PO Box 25626 Wellington 6146 Solicitor Acting: Amanda Dewar Email: amanda.dewar@laneneave.co.nz Phone:...

5. [2018] NZEnvC 031 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...required under this appeal as a result of the High Court decision. [2] In the meantime, the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) has filed a late s 274 notice, together with an application for waiver. [3] All parties other than Royal Forest and Bird consent to the waiver or abide the decision of the Court. Royal Forest and Bird opposes the waiver, citing undue prejudice, and in addition that the various elements of discretion do not apply. Consideration of application for waiver [4...

6. 10 December 2019 Wilkins Farming Co. Ltd v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...happen where the hearing time allocated by the Court is not used. 2. EVIDENCE The parties must (subject to any existing timetable order or direction of the Court): Exchange no later than 10 working days before the date of hearing - all of the statements and evidence that will be produced to the Court at the hearing. 3. MAORI LANGUAGE AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS If any party or witness: 1. wishes to speak Maori at the hearing under the Maori Language Act 1987, or 2. has special needs...

7. ENV-2016-AKL-000TBA Walden v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...notice of the decision in an Auckland Council Governing Body minute dated: 19 August 2016. 7 The decision was made by Aucldand Council. 8 The part of the decision that I am appealing is as follows: The decision to remove from the Regional Policy Statement the Rural Urban Boundary as it relates to Waiheke Island. 9 The reasons for the appeal are as follows: a) There was not any submission or further submisison to the Proposed Aucldand Unitary Plan (PAUP) requesting the deletion of t...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 152 Performance Cleaners v Chinan [pdf, 546 KB]

   ...Performance Cleaners, holding that Ms Chinan had not breached express or implied terms and obligations of her employment agreement.3 [7] The essence of the challenge which is now brought by Performance Cleaners is contained in this paragraph from its statement of claim: 29. The defendant was party to an IEA with express and implied terms of employment as referred to above … The defendant breached those obligations in a number of ways, inter alia:

9. LCRO 208/2021 PK v GH (13 June 2023) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...PK considered his fees to be fair and reasonable. The Standards Committee determination [42] The Committee summarised Mrs GH’s complaints as being that Mr PK:9 a. was discourteous; b. deducted his fee from funds held in trust without her consent; c. charged an excessive fee; d. charged for work outside the terms of engagement; and e. acted in a conflict of interest situation on the work outside the terms of engagement. [43] It then recorded the issues to be address...

10. Hartley v Balemi [pdf, 401 KB]

    ...other parties to be given the opportunity to make submissions either in support or in opposition of such applications. Therefore, I asked the parties for their views. I was advised that all parties has been made aware of this application and consented to this removal, so I directed that the fifth respondents should be struck out from this adjudication. 2.5 The seventh respondent is Balemi Enterprises Ltd, a company that owned the land at the time that it was subdivided and th...