Search Results

1. [2021] NZREADT 11 - Beath v The Real Estate Agents Authority, Mike Pero Real Estate Ltd, Kemp & Scoble (22 March 2021) [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...any) (“the Administrator’s emails”); [d] Oral evidence to be given by a solicitor acting for the Agency and the licensees (Mr Napier); [e] Oral evidence to be given by one of the vendors of the property (Ms Dinh); and [f] An emailed statement by Ms Amy Washbourn (co-purchaser of the property with Mr Beath and originally a co-complainant) to an Authority investigator, Mr Radovich. [17] We record that the emails referred to in sub-paragraph [a], above, were before the Co...

2. Allington v REAA & Anor [2014] NZREADT 6 [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...although he did not make the licensee aware of his interest, he was prepared to make a pre-auction offer of $750,000. However, the appellant was not in a position to make an unconditional offer. [8] The licensee disputes that she made the alleged statement to the complainant/appellant about pre-auction offers less than $850,000 being inadequate. She states that she merely told those who enquired of her that the price would be higher than $650,000 and that the rateable value of the...

3. Director of Proceedings v Counties Manukau District Health Board [2020] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 578 KB]

   ...1 [This decision is to be cited as: Director of Proceedings v Counties Manukau District Health Board [2020] NZHRRT 4] 1 [2] Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: [2.1] A Consent Memorandum dated 14 October 2019. [2.2] An Agreed Summary of Facts, a copy of which is annexed and marked "A". [3] The Consent Memorandum is in the following terms: MAY I...

4. [2024] NZEmpC 74 Hu v Passion Fresh Ltd [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...She has challenged that determination. [4] Passion Fresh defended Ms Hu’s challenge, and maintained it was not a controlling third party, but Whver did not participate in the proceeding. What happened? [5] Evidence was provided by an agreed statement of facts and common bundle of documents. Ms Hu entered into an individual employment agreement with Whver in early 2021, as a casual greenhouse worker. She began work on 6 January 2021 and was sent to Passion Fresh. Whver invoi...

5. Parihaka Te Kawanata o Rongo Deed of Reconciliation [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   PARIHAKA and THE PARIHAKA PAPAKAINGA TRUST and THE CROWN ) TE KAWENATA O RONGO DEED OF RECONCILIATION PURPOSE OF TE KAW ENATA O RONGO The overall purpose of Te Kawenata o Rongo is to record a reconciliation between Parihaka and the Crown in order to: • recognise the importance of Parihaka and its legacy; • acknowledge the significant historical events that occurred at Parihaka; and • provide support for Parihaka’s future development. On that basis, Te Kawenata o Rongo reco

6. [2021] NZEnvC 042 Baldock v Auckland Council Community Facilities [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...Buchanan and D Hartley for the Council Date of Decision: 12 April 2021 Date of Issue: 12 April 2021 DECISION ON APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ENFORCEMENT ORDER ORDER A: Auckland Council Community Facilities, as the holder of Auckland Council Resource Consent LUC6031424, shall: BALDOCK v AUCKLAND COUNCIL COi\fivIUNITY FACILITIES 2 (a) Provide as soon as possible to the owners and occupiers of the dwellings on West View Road identified in condition 17 ~) of the resource consent a...

7. [2006] NZEmpC WC 24/06 Weston v Fraser [pdf, 32 KB]

   ...totalling $27,550. When that amount was not paid, Mr Fraser moved to enforce the judgment and obtained a charging order over a property owned jointly by Mr Weston and his partner, Ms Allen. That charging order was defeated by a prior equity and by consent was transferred on 6 December 2006 to another property owned by them. [4] In May 2006, Mr Weston’s then solicitors filed a challenge to the Authority’s determination. [5] In June 2006, Mr Weston personally applied for a...

8. Donkin v CAC 10057 & Morton-Jones [2012] NZREADT 44 [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...licensee’s responsibility to confirm details contained in the LIM prior to advertising any such details. In this case, that of the property being a home and income. It is therefore not sufficient for the licensee to rely on information concerning consents obtained for the property from the vendor and the Terralink Property Guru alone in order to make the assumption that the property was a home and income”. [3] In the penalty decision in July 2011 the CAC ordered Ms Donkin to apol...

9. CD v QXF [2011] NZIACDT 31 (20 September 2011) [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...Adviser became distressed. He explained how the company’s financial difficulties had led to him having to protect clients and he had accounted for funds after paying fees. The interview progressed over some hours and the Adviser eventually made statements accepting responsibility for fault and failure, which he now recognises he should not have made. The record of the interview and the Adviser’s evidence suggest the Adviser was concerned he may not have taken the proper action in his...

10. JL v N Ltd [2022] NZDT 76 (17 June 2022) [pdf, 157 KB]

    ...at the hearing the fact that the vehicle crossing area was given Council approval does not prove that the concreted driveway, paths and steps within the property boundary were constructed adequately as they were not subject to Council inspection or consent requirements. I accept D’s statement that the work was carried out at one time (both the vehicle crossing and the rest of the work within the site) and his photographs show that, but the photographs are not detailed enough to prove th...