Search Results

Search results for statement of consent.

5311 items matching your search terms

  1. AH v ZS LCRO 90 / 2010 (10 February 2011) [pdf, 79 KB]

    ...Respondent and Mr GB wished to be satisfied that any distribution to the Applicant would not be subjected to “claw-back” by the equivalent in Australia of the Official Assignee in Bankruptcy. [7] They also requested that the proposed distribution be consented to by the Applicant‟s family, who were also discretionary beneficiaries under the Trusts. [8] A deed was prepared by the Respondent with regard to the proposed distribution, which included an acknowledgement of the propos...

  2. [2020] NZEmpC 135 Wills v Farmlands Co-Operative Society Ltd [pdf, 210 KB]

    ...progress with her personal grievance, but they were not answered. Ms Wills and Mr Mason met in mid-July 2018 when he explained for the first time that no steps had been taken to raise a grievance with Farmlands. A grievance was not raised until a statement of problem was lodged with the Authority on 27 August 2018 and served on the company. Raising a personal grievance [9] As has already been mention, s 114(1) of the Act requires a personal grievance to be raised within 90 d...

  3. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Hart [2012] NZLCDT 20 [pdf, 455 KB]

    ...asked to pay a further $15,000 on 19 November 2008, in advance of the bail appeal hearing, and finally, on 15 December 2008 prior to a District Court appearance to seek electronically monitored bail and continuation of interim name suppression by consent, a further $10,000 was paid. [59] The primary background evidence for the Standards Committee was given by Ms T, the sister of the accused who Mr Hart represented, and the family spokesperson. It was supplemented by the evidence...

  4. B v Southern Response Earthquake Services Ltd [2021] CEIT-2021-0006 [pdf, 336 KB]

    ...prove unsuitable due to sub-soil conditions, the agreement set out a mechanism based on the joint report, to assess if “enhanced foundations” were necessary (the foundation assessment); and d. there were timeframes for obtaining a building consent, demolition and the foundation assessment. Key terms are set out in full below at paragraph [50]. 8) On the same day Mr B emailed a list of issues regarding his disagreement with the joint report to his engineer S and the other...

  5. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 DM local David Waters [pdf, 81 KB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 87G of the Resource Management Act 1991 (Act) requesting the granting of resource consents to Waiheke Marinas Limited to establish and operate a marina at Matiatia Bay, Waiheke Island, in the Hauraki Gulf ENV-2013-AKL-000174 STATEMENT OF LAY EVIDENCE OF DAVID WATERS (SURPLUS MOORINGS TE HURIHI BAY) ON BEHALF OF DIRECTION MATIATIA INCORPORATED AND OTHERS...

  6. Advantage Realty Limited v CAC303 & Anor [2016] NZREADT 6 [pdf, 63 KB]

    ...applied that we recall our 30 November 2015 decision herein Advantage Realty Ltd v REAA and Gambino [2015] NZREADT 83 on the basis that we inadvertently referred to using the appraised value, rather than the agreed price, for the provisional value in Statement B of Form 2. That form is a Schedule to the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 as a client consent for a licensee to acquire an interest in the property in compliance with ss 134 and 135 of the Act. [2] More specifically, the Authority...

  7. Taupo District Council.pdf [pdf, 252 KB]

    ...implications for councils and may mean that Objective 3 cannot be achieved. Further, the proposed amendments create additional barriers to point source discharges and increase costs. Policy 14 f) TDC opposes the amendments that would restrict consent duration to 2035. Such a term is unrealistic for Regionally Significant Infrastructure and would not give effect to the Regional Policy Statement. The benefit and achievability of a “straight line” progression is quest...

  8. Black - Awhitu Parish Lot 112 (2002) 101 Waikato MB 9 (101 W 9) [pdf, 777 KB]

    ...has succeeded me, should deal with the matter. Judge Milroy then referred the matter to me. There are difficulties in that the Act provides that an application cannot be handled by a Judge other than one who has previously presided without the consent of the parties. In his minute at 95 WH 123-124, Judge Spencer expresses certain views. He indicates that he would have dismissed the application but for the issues involving the Crown block and suggests that the Court might get fur...

  10. 24 May 2021 Drive Holdings Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...application to demolish existing buildings and construct 7 multi-level buildings at Tamaki Drive, Patteson Avenue and Marau Crescent, Mission Bay, Auckland ENV-2019-304-000097 Drive Holdings Limited v Auckland Council Appeal Against Decision Of Consent Authority pursuant to Section 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 Court Reference: ENV-2019-AKL-000283 1. i. Topic: Topic...