Search Results

1. CE v FG LCRO 346/2013 (27 August 2015) [pdf, 55 KB]

   ...of the complaints system. The Court is not bound in any way by any comments made by this Office, and I do not in any event intend to make any comments on those issues, as it is beyond the jurisdiction of this Office. [19] I then sought consent from the applicants for the review to be completed on the papers. Mr FG had previously consented to this. [20] JE replied by email on 19 August 2015, advising that they would not be attending the hearing and making further comments....

2. A v ZN LCRO 321/2012 (29 April 2014) [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...with which Mr ZN had provided a letter in support of [Accounts]. The complaints centred on the fact that Mr ZN had acted for both parties whose interests were in conflict without explaining the implications of the conflict and without obtaining consent from [Company A]. [8] Further details of the complaints were provided by Ms AP of [Law Firm A]:4 1. [Mr] ZN did not: a) Explain to [Company A] how a conflict may arise; b) Recommend that [Company A] obtain independent legal adv...

3. Tawhai - Rakautatahi B2 (2002) 167 Napier MB 279 (167 NA 269) [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...August 1992 now needs to be addressed but this is not a matter before this Court. Until this matter has been resolved an injunction should issue restraining payment of these funds. If the parties can agree as to their disposal then they could by consent memorandum apply to the Court seeking cancellation of the injunction. Alternatively the matter may have to be resolved by a section 242 application to the lower Court which would at the same time make orders cancelling the injunction&quo...

4. [2020] NZIACDT 18 - UO v Nukulasi [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...futile when she first saw them in September 2017. By October 2018, they had not held visas for two years and the supporting documentation was weak. A breach of cl 9 was admitted because Ms Nukulasi had not obtained the complainant’s written consent to proceed. [20] As for the allegation that the s 61 request should have been made to Immigration New Zealand, it was submitted that directing it to the Minister was the correct process. Section 61 made it clear that such requests we...

5. Smith - Pekapeka 2A1D2B (2021) 91 Tākitimu MB 145 (91 TKT 145) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...land, Dawn Winterburn who lives in Australia and aged about 90 years, is also against any further development. Other conversations occurred where it was alleged Ms Cracknell had agreed that Ms Smith could build “over the back” followed by a statement it is said that Ms Cracknell agreed “she can build one house for herself but not a papakāinga development”. Ms Smith submitted that she considered Ms Cracknell “has not understood my intention” even after meeting with her f...

6. EI v SB & HS [2015] NZDT 1437 (28 October 2015) [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...p/m at a cost of approx. $2,500.00 p/m.” However, again I accept HS’ evidence that he was simply passing on information that he received from officers of EN. There is nothing in the email that suggests that HS conveyed the information as his own statement neither did he express his own view on the information. 46. I therefore find that HS’ conduct in relation to the information sent to EI was not misleading or deceptive. Has EI established the loss suffered as a result of any m...

7. Kelly-Kaipo v Matiu - Mimitu Ruarei 4B 2H 4B 2J and 4B 2K (2024) 275 Taitokerau MB 252 (275 TTK 252) [pdf, 313 KB]

   ...wonderful idea. I think it will move us forward, it will get us all informed. Everyone will know exactly where we are at. [23] The Court’s suggestion was also supported by the respondent trustees and therefore, interlocutory directions were made by consent to appoint a facilitator and hold an AGM for the Trust. [24] In addition, directions were made by consent, ensuring that the appropriate documents and accounts were to be filed at the AGM and to appoint a lawyer to assist wit...

8. Haimona v The Trustees of Te Karaka No.1A Ahu Whenua Trust - Te Karaka No.1A [2015] Chief Judge's MB 228 (2015 CJ 228) [pdf, 334 KB]

   2015 Chief Judge’s MB 228 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20110007137 CJ 2011/46 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF The Māori feehold land known as Te Karaka No. 1A and Rotoiti 3G1 Blocks BETWEEN TORO HAIMONA Applicant AND THE TRUSTEES OF TE KARAKA NO. 1A AHU WHENUA TRUST Respondent Hearing: 10 March 2013 at 93 Waiariki MB 216-258 (Heard at Rotorua) A

9. [2024] NZEnvC 149 Learning Houses Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 466 KB]

   ...parties Court: Environment Judge S M Tepania sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Last case event: 11 June 2024 Date of Determination: 26 June 2024 Date of Issue: 26 June 2024 _________________________________________________________________ CONSENT DETERMINATION _________________________________________________________________ A: Under section 279(1)(b) of the Resource Management Act 1991, the Environment Court, by consent, orders that: (1) the appeal is allowed. Land use...

10. LCRO 38/2024 & 39/2024 SM v CV and CV v SM (13 August 2025) [pdf, 275 KB]

    ...(the property that Ms SM was purchasing) had been reduced by 13 square metres ‘due to the two rear townhouses having been sited 0.9 metres closer to the rear boundary (the eastern boundary) than shown on the scheme plan for the original resource consent’, necessitating a variation of the resource consent which had been obtained. [18] He advised that his client did not agree to the rental terms proposed by Ms SM. [19] Mr CV forwarded this email to Ms SM who advised that she would...