[2018] NZEmpC 63 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 342 KB]
...with this contention.3 [12] By this stage, Mr Lorigan was self-represented. Because it was apparent that he would have difficulty in re-pleading the removed matters, and on the acquiescence of Mr Towner, counsel for Infinity, I ruled that the statements of problems and statements of reply regarding the proceedings in the Authority would now be pleadings in this Court. (footnotes omitted) [5] I propose to deal with the various applications in the order in which they arose. Comp...