LCRO 183/2020 DX v SQ (26 February 2021) [pdf, 260 KB]
...obligations. (1) Request for information [24] The Committee concluded that (a) Mr DX’s need, for personal reasons, to travel overseas did not excuse him from providing the information about HX’s estate requested from him, and (b) Ms SQ’s statements in her letters to the banks, from whom she requested information about HX, that she was assisting YX and RX in “the administration” of HX’s estate, or “with the estate”, were “not untrue or fraudulent”. [25] In sup...