Search Results

1. COES - J Sullivan - SoE - 21 April 2021.pdf [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...We know it is two thirds, because the hydrologist who is waist deep in the channel measuring cross sections of the channel, tells us. Over to the right, the main stem of the Manuherikia limps on. It is a stream I step across in two steps. (All the consent asks of the irrigation company is that a river 15cm deep and 30 cm wide is left for the public’s recreation.) Photo 4 Manuherekia near confluence with Clutha/Mata-au April 2019 It is autumn when I come to the last stretch of the...

2. [2018] NZEmpC 161 Aslan Farms Ltd v Johnstone [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...extremely brief opportunity provided for the parties to address the orders that had been made. [4] On 6 December 2018 the Authority conducted an investigation into an application made by the defendant in this proceeding for interim reinstatement pursuant to s 127 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). The Authority issued a determination on 19 December 2018 granting the application and ordering the defendant be reinstated to his former position as Farm Manager for...

3. 2021-03-09 Margaret Lucy Johns- s 274 notice [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...properties between the times of 2.45pm and 3.30pm will be further inconvenienced by another half hour meaning it will be difficult, if not sometimes impossible, to access or leave their properties before 4pm on a week day.  As noted in the Resource Consent Review – Transportation by Abley ( AC-J007-01 - 15 June 2020) the data for modelling was recorded in 2016 and 2018 . It mentions that Kristin School roll has increased by 117 students which they say will have a negligible eff...

4. NS v OA Ltd [2023] NZDT 110 (26 June 2023).pdf [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...that it was liquid damaged, which it said voided the warranty as the warranty states that these machines are for dry vacuuming only. So, OA Ltd said it would cost NS $288.85 if she wanted it repaired. 4. NS claims $2,300.00 which was increased with consent from $2,202.00, for the vacuum price and $90.00 for the Disputes Tribunal fee. 5. The issues to be determined are: a) Is the vacuum of an acceptable quality? b) If not, was NS entitled to reject the vacuum cleaner? Is the vacuum...

5. [2010] NZEmpC 103 Coy v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...than a week. [2] First, I set out the principles by which the admissibility of the evidence intended to be called by the plaintiff, and which is challenged, will be determined. The starting point as always is the pleadings, the most up to date statements of claim and defence. Ms Coy’s case consists of a number of personal grievances against her former employer. These include unjustified disadvantage in employment and unjustified constructive dismissal. A constructive dismissal...

6. [2021] NZEmpC 177 Allison v Ceres New Zealand LLC [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...management caused by two factions in the company that did not communicate with each other. Later, this allegation expanded to include a claim that Mr Allison was being removed because he and Mr Gowda did not get along. PBEL’s letter ended with a statement that if Mr Allison’s position was disestablished he would have grounds to raise a personal grievance. [8] Ceres continued with its proposal. Mr Allison was eventually dismissed for redundancy and paid out the n...

7. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Crampton [2015] NZHRRT 35 [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...point in time they did not want external media involved. It was decided that Mr Crampton would do a media release to inform student members what was going on. The evidence of Ms Chapman in reply [46] As part of the pre-hearing exchange of written statements Ms Chapman filed a statement in reply to the statements filed by Mr Crampton, Ms O’Dea and Ms Ward. The principal points in reply made by Ms Chapman were: [46.1] The meeting held in her absence on 4 March 2013 was not a valid m...

8. Boyce and Bates v The Real Estate Agents Authority [2017] NZREADT 40 [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...ROW for access, this has affected him starting to build a house on the section as he does not know how the dispute will affect or impact 8 There is no mention (in either the second respondents’ statements to the Authority’s investigator, or Mr Bates’ response to the complaint) that Mr Bates had any discussion with either of the second respondents. on his there and he still does not know what the final outcome of the disput...

9. Taueki v Horowhenua Sailing Club Ltd - Horowhenua (11) Lake (2013) 304 Aotea MB 288 (304 AOT 288) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...submitting licence applications. Submissions [8] On 12 February 2013 Mr Kerr filed a notice of opposition on behalf of the Club. In his notice counsel asserts that storage of boats on the Domain has occurred continuously since 1965 under various consents, licences, or permissions granted by the Board. He says that the building was erected by the club and the wider community. Mr Kerr also says, inter alia, that this Court is not the appropriate forum to adjudicate on the Board’s...

10. Churton v Trustees of the Mangaporou Trust (2015) 337 Aotea MB 131 (337 AOT 131) [pdf, 219 KB]

    ...terms as the Judge thinks fit, direct the holding of a conference of parties or intended parties or their counsel presided over by a Judge. (2) At any such conference, the Judge presiding may do all or any of the following things: (a) with the consent of the applicant, amend the application to give better effect to the applicant’s intention: (b) settle the issues to be determined: (c) give directions as to service, and as to the public notification of the application and a...