Search Results

1. Cameron v Hastings District Council [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...claim under s30(1)(b) of the WHRS Act, and secondly confirmation of a settlement between those parties pursuant to s42(5) of the WHRS Act. I indicated to those parties that I could not treat that as a withdrawal of the claim as all parties had not consented to it under s30 of the WHRS Act nor as a settlement of the claim pursuant to s42 as it was not a full settlement of the whole claim. 3.5 I was advised, as I had requested, that pursuant to that settlement the claimants had...

2. Body Corporate 85927, 38 Roxborough St v Wellington City Council [2010] NZWHT Wellington 12 [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...David Stewart of CAS visited his offices at Paraparaumu and discussed the concept plans for the proposed development. Mr Stewart said he went to Design Network at the Paraparaumu offices on more than one occasion. He went on to say in his statement: “Aside from the fact that I find it very surprising Mr Stevens states that he did not check or supervise the work of his draftsmen, who apparently drew up the architectural plans, it was clear from my meetings with Mr Stevens th...

3. LCRO 92/2016 ZA v YB (7 January 2019) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...her father’s death. She was concerned that computers and facilities to access her father’s [BANK A] accounts in New Zealand were beyond her control and at her request Mr ZA wrote to [BANK A]. His 20 July 2015 letter included the following statements: 2 We are holding a will which the late Mr XC made on 17 May 2007. In it, he appoints his daughter YB, to be the sole executrix of his estate if she survives him for 14 days, ie. 30 July 2015. It is YC (now YB) who has prov...

4. LCRO 66/2015 OB v FL (2 October 2018) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...did not abate. It seems Mrs VR went to Mrs DB’s house and collected some things. Mr OB took exception to Mrs VR entering the house, describing this as a “forced entry” by his sister. He says she removed chattels and jewellery without his consent. It is understood that Mrs VR had obtained independent advice by this point. [21] The firm continued to act on the joint instruction, but the relationship between Mr OB and Mrs VR did not improve. Unable to communicate with one an...

5. Example fraud and corruption policy [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...Corruption Policy applies. If you are unsure as to which policy applies, contact Risk and Assurance or your HR representative. Errors This policy distinguishes between fraud and error. Within this definition, ‘error’ refers to an unintentional misstatement of information (e.g. financial information), including the unintentional omission of an amount or a disclosure. In order to assess whether a potential issue should be investigated under this policy, contact Risk and Assurance...

6. Charleton - Parihaka X Trust (2005) 154 Aotea MB 45 (154 AOT 45) [pdf, 553 KB]

   ...equitable owner may attend and vote at any nleeting of equitable owners either personally or by proxy appointed by him in writing. (d) No person shall be competent to act as a proxy for any equitable owner if that person is either a trustee or has consented before or at that meeting to be nominated as a trustee. (e) The trustees may be guided but not bound by any views expressed at any meeting whether embodied in a formal resolution or not PROVIDED HOWEVER that if any such views or res...

7. Rautahi - Kaitoki 2C2B (2004) 178 Napier MB 26 (178 NA 26) [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...land from general land to Maori land come down to a desire to have the land under the jurisdiction and protection of the Maori Land Court. He also expressed a desire to have the land put into a Maori Trust. 11 . Eleanor Rautahi and Myra McKay filed statements of opposition with the Court. In essence their arguments are that they will be restricted in their choices if the status of the land were to change. For her part, Eleanor Rautahi states that she wishes to deal with her interest in...

8. Finlay v Baker [pdf, 42 KB]

   ...Hagans between 22 May 1998 and 24 June 1998. The vendor in the contract should have been Lajak. 19. It appears that Mr Finlay regarded himself and Lajak as one entity. He signed the sale as if they were one entity. The application for building consent applied for on 2 June 1998 shows Mr Finlay as owner, contact person and builder. The consent was issued to Mr Finlay in those capacities. 6 20. It appears that the claimant carried out some negotiations as one builder appears to...

9. [2017] NZEmpC 38 Eden Group Ltd v Jackson [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...hearing stage is that it is not until the hearing that the parties have fully identified the issues with which the Court is required to deal. The preliminary stages of litigation involve the parties in a great deal of paperwork, such as the filing of statements of claim and defence, and discovery by way of the exchange of lists of relevant documents. Changes of pleading often follow discovery and inspection, and the parties may be requested to provide further particulars of their pl...

10. 2. NZCVR application form v0.2 [docx, 209 KB]

    ...· psychological distress · employment status · housing and tenure CAPI (with the exception of gender and sexual identity and income, which are administered using CASI) Exit and re-contact questions · re-contact for audit · future research consent · data linking · interviewer observations · respondent burden assessment CAPI The NZCVS datasets in the IDI contain all records for which informed consent was obtained from respondents (more than 90% of all interviews). Note that...