Search Results

1. LCRO 228/2015 ZM v VC [pdf, 123 KB]

   ...lay applicants that they identify their grounds of review, and any information relied on, when they file their review. [66] The LCRO review guidelines (given to all parties) direct that an applicant is to provide with their review: (a) a clear statement of the reasons for seeking the review (i.e. why you considered the Standards Committee decision to be wrong or unfair); (b) a statement of the remedy or remedies you are seeking; and (c) all relevant information (statements and/or...

2. LCRO 229/2015 ZM v BM, VJ, FR and XS QC [pdf, 120 KB]

   ...lay applicants that they identify their grounds of review, and any information relied on, when they file their review. [65] The LCRO review guidelines (given to all parties) direct that an applicant is to provide with their review: (a) a clear statement of the reasons for seeking the review (i.e. why you considered the Standards Committee decision to be wrong or unfair); (b) a statement of the remedy or remedies you are seeking; and (c) all relevant information (statements and/or...

3. HE and SD v QXF [2011] NZIACDT 32 (20 September 2011) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...Whangarei and find out why we were disputing the invoice and to find out exactly what happened. CD and his partner B have made every effort to help us and have now refunded some of the monies that we feel we were overcharged. It is clear by some statements made in emails to us, asking us to send documents directly to his address in Russell; that his intention was not to conduct our business in a professional manner and exclude [his employer]. [8] The CD complaint has been dismissed and...

4. NNS v MUL [2014] NZIACDT 18 (26 February 2014) [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...Tribunal is required to determine the merits of these competing positions as to how the adviser dealt with the instructions. The Tribunal is satisfied on the evidence it should dismiss the complaint. The matters in issue [5] The Registrar filed a Statement of Complaint setting out the grounds of complaint. There were difficulties in establishing what was in issue and ultimately, the complainant, through her counsel, filed a Memorandum of Claim dated 18 December 2013. [6] I will take t...

5. [2016] NZEmpC 168 Borsboom (Labour Inspector) v Preet PVT Ltd & Others [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...that assets of the respondents to that value should not be removed or disposed of. Assets within the jurisdiction [30] The Labour Inspector has filed evidence that each respondent has assets within the jurisdiction. [31] Financial statements in respect of both Preet and Warrington have been placed before the Court. According to those statements, each such entity apparently held significant stock on hand as at March 2016. Each is also recorded as owning plant, equipm...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 75 Horizon Concepts Ltd v Hayward [pdf, 435 KB]

   ...the benefit of hindsight, the participants may now regret. [11] Everything came to a head in that confrontation where Mr Hayward and Mr Wood were, possibly, reluctant observers and eventual participants. When the parties went their own ways, statements were made by Mr Wood, and Mr Hayward, that are capable of being interpreted as ending their working relationship. Mr Hayward did not return to work afterwards except briefly the following day when he tidied the office and remove...

7. [2020] NZEmpC 49 Maritime Union of New Zealand Inc v ISO Ltd [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...no standing, but concluded the union’s participation as a party would be just.9 The challenge [10] MUNZ and Mr Seymour’s challenge to the 2019 determination elected to have the whole matter heard again.10 [11] While most of the statement of claim contained pleadings about the agreement between Mr Seymour and ISO, there is one paragraph dedicated to the relationship 5 At [25]. 6 2019 determination, above n 1, at [6]....

8. [2017] NZEmpC 74 Speed v Board of Trustees of Wellington Girls College [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...commenced against the defendant and others. The second application is by the defendant seeking security for costs against the plaintiff and a stay pending that security being provided. The defendant also seeks an enlargement of time to file a statement of defence until 30 days after any security that is ordered to be paid is, in fact, paid. Background [2] Mr Speed is an experienced teacher. The reason for proceedings having been issued in this Court, and in the High Cou...

9. [2024] NZREADT 05 CAC v Pang (6 March 2024) [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...imposed and an understanding of the extenuating circumstances surrounding his actions. He is committed to rectifying his mistake and moving forward responsibly. [26] On 21 February 2024, Mr Pang sent to the Tribunal his New Zealand bank account statements from 22 February 2022 until 15 February 2024. He submits that the accusations and penalties sought by the Committee are unreasonable and unfair. [27] Mr Pang further states that Ms Mok’s comment that his submissions to the...

10. [2023] NZREADT 33 - CAC 2102 v LL (4 December 2023) [pdf, 240 KB]

    ...[17] During the course of drafting the charge, the Committee told LL it would consider any further information he wanted to provide about his alibi. LL asserted his denial, maintained he was out to dinner and provided the Committee with a signed statement from his wife saying that they had been out for dinner. [18] LL subsequently accepted this alibi account was false. [19] On 24 July 2023, LL licence was cancelled for non-compliance with CPD requirements and he is consequently pro...