Search Results

1. [2022] NZIACDT 29 - EQ v McCarthy (19 December 2022) [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...presumably completed as far as he could, to the complainant on 29 January 2020. He set a target date of 20 February for having everything together for a final check, before being couriered to him. 1 Email X to the Authority (14 March 2022). 2 Statement of reply (9 September 2022), Attachment I. 4 [15] The complainant sent an email to Mr McCarthy on 9 April 2020 stating that the family were “under quarantine and Emergency state” from 13 March to 13 May. They would...

2. Hutcheson v Houkamau - Porangahau 2B No 10 (2021) 88 Takitimu MB 118 (88 TKT 118) [pdf, 581 KB]

   88 Tākitimu MB 118 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TĀKITIMU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tākitimu District A20180005757 WĀHANGA Under Regulation 21, Māori Reservation Regulations 1994 Sections 37, 236, 237, 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Porangahau 2B No 10 and Other Blocks (Rongomaraeroa Marae) I WAENGA I A Between AIMEE WHAITIRI HUTCHESON, NICHOLAS REIHANA

3. [2021] NZACC 135–NT v ACC (10 August 2021) [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...Schedule 3 event had occurred or that NT had 12 suffered a mental injury as a consequence thereof. NT then lodged a Notice of Appeal. [40] The police investigation which had been launched in November 2012 involved interviewing and obtaining statements from 13 witnesses, including NT’s sister, seven employees of NT’s company, staff at the hotel, clients and suppliers of the company, and the police also conducted a site visit to the hotel. On 27 October 2014, Police Offic...

4. RIS-Improving-the-timeliness-of-the-vote-count-final.docx [pdf, 437 KB]

   [image: ]BUDGET SENSITIVE [image: ] BUDGET SENSITIVE Regulatory Impact Statement: Improving the timeliness of the official vote count Decision sought Cabinet decisions on policy proposals for the Electoral Matters Bill Agency responsible Ministry of Justice Proposing Ministers Minister of Justice Date finalised 27 March 2025 This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) relates to a package of legislative changes intended to improve the timeliness of the official vote count at general

5. Tweeddale v Pearson [pdf, 405 KB]

   ...BACKGROUND [1] This case concerns a leaky house as a result of defective plastering and high ground levels. The vendors gave warranties which were breached. The level of supervision of the building was inadequate. The plans were adequate for consent purposes and to permit competent tradespeople to erect a weathertight dwelling. HISTORY OF HOUSE [2] Michael Pearson and Karen Tucker owned a section and wished to build a house on it. They approached Barrakuda Design to pre...

6. Brooking v Henderson - Wharekahika A47 (2022) 110 Tairawhiti MB 238 (110 TRW 238) [pdf, 497 KB]

   ...A – Consent for payment to A Henderson 2018. (b) Exhibit B – Email correspondence raising whether A Henderson should forgo his trustee role. 110 Tairawhiti MB 248 respondent knew that he would oppose it. The respondent prepared the consents and listed all the trustees except himself. Most of the work that the respondent undertook was work as a trustee and much of the work he did was never authorised by the trust. Rather “he just went off and did it himself.” An e...

7. Tumene - Succession to Ihimaera Wiringi [2021] Chief Judges MB 587(2021 CJ 587) [pdf, 508 KB]

   ...MB 590 Court Research 8. Application was made for succession to Ihimaera Wiringi by John Te Manihera Chadwick as executor of the Will of the deceased1. 9. A copy of the deceased’s Will has been reproduced below. 10. On file is a consent from Paerau Wiringi (wife) dated 30 July 2008: (i) consenting to the constitution of the Ihimaera Wiringi Whānau Trust; 1 A20080009864 2021 Chief Judge’s MB 591 (ii) waiving her right to take a life interest in the Māor...

8. [2019] NZREADT 37 - Tafilipepe - penalty [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...dependent on proof of harm. Secondly, it is significant that Ms Cokojic was sufficiently concerned as to Mr S having been brought to the property that she contacted MPRE very shortly after Ms Tafilipepe’s call to her concerning a price range, and statement that “we can get an offer to you this afternoon…”. Her concern was that the offer referred to by Ms Tafilipepe would come from Mr S, and that, in the circumstances, he should not have been at the property without her permi...

9. OIA 98726 [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...there has been no apparent consideration of the potential impacts for Māori or Te Tiriti. Therefore, we do not support the current cross-border disclosure framework until the Act adequately provides protections for Māori data including prior informed consent from Māori to cross- border disclosure of Māori data. (ii) Consequences for Māori from cross-border disclosure 14. THRMOA is concerned about the cross-border disclosure of Māori data without prior informed consent from Māori. As...

10. Auckland 356 Complaints Committee and Auckland No. 1 Standards Committee v Sanders [2010] NZLCDT 21 [pdf, 255 KB]

    ...trust account with Mr Sanders. Mr P had instructed Mr Sanders to transfer $174,000 of that money to Mr P’s mother. Mr Sanders made the transfer without obtaining instructions from Mrs P. The Tribunal found that Mr Sanders had to have Mrs P’s consent or authority to properly make the transfer. In making the transfer without Mrs P’s consent or authority Mr Sanders breached both the Law Practitioners Act and the Solicitors Trust Account Rules. [7] The D Representation Charge and the...