5270 items matching your search terms
WAITANGI TRIBUNAL BIBLIOGRAPHY Tribunal Reports, Publications and Research Reports Presented in Evidence 1975-2016 Part 1: Waitangi Tribunal Reports, Statements and Publications Waitangi Tribunal 2017 ISSN 2463-7181 WT Bibliography 1975-2016 Part 1 28 February 2017 Page 1 of 38 Foreword by the Chairperson of the Waitangi Tribunal The Waitangi Tribunal has now been part of our legal landscape for...
WAITANGI TRIBUNAL BIBLIOGRAPHY Tribunal Reports, Publications and Research Reports Presented in Evidence 1975-2016 Part 1: Waitangi Tribunal Reports, Statements and Publications Waitangi Tribunal 2017 ISSN 2463-7181 WT Bibliography 1975-2016 Part 1 28 February 2017 Page 1 of 38 Foreword by the Chairperson of the Waitangi Tribunal The Waitangi Tribunal has now been part of our legal landscape for...
WAITANGI TRIBUNAL BIBLIOGRAPHY Tribunal Reports, Publications and Research Reports Presented in Evidence 1975-2018 Part 1: Waitangi Tribunal Reports, Statements and Publications Waitangi Tribunal 2019 ISSN 2463-7181 May 2019 WT Bibliography 1975-2018 Part 1 1 Page 1 of 38 Foreword by the Chairperson of the Waitangi Tribunal The Waitangi Tribunal has now been part of our l...
2016 Maori Appellate Court MB 143 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20150001176 APPEAL 2015/5 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal against orders of the Māori Land Court made on 21 November 2014 at 328 Aotea MB 225-237 in relation to Mohakatino Parininihi No 1C West 3A2 BETWEEN HAUMOANA WHITE Appellant AND ANGELA HELEN POTROZ, JOHN EDWARD POTROZ AND BARRY STUART KING
© Crown Copyright, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Hon Kris Faafoi Minister of Justice Proactive release – Security Information in Proceedings Legislation Bill Date of issue: 7 December 2021 The following documents have been proactively released. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been note
...co-operation and exchange of information between Courts and administrative authorities of Contracting States. There is already a well-developed level of co-operation under the Child Abduction Convention and New Zealand is at the forefront of this. Statement of feasible options for achieving the desired objectives Retain the status quo 40. An alternative to acceding to the Convention would be to retain the status quo. Subpart 3 of the Care of Children Act 2004 provides for the enfor...
...to Gary from his father to come home and make good the old home for himself and his family. Mr Shanahan submits that Mrs Tipene is prepared to give up her previous expectations of a right of occupation or ownership of the old home based on the statements of Gary’s father. The Court should however take this into account when considering what is appropriate because any indication that rental would be imposed on her and her late husband and children for continued occupation of the...
...of Telecom’s counsel, which Mr Narayan had unjustifiably and unreasonably escalated. 4 These are all matters which will need to be considered later when the issue of costs comes to be dealt with. The pleadings [6] Mr Narayan’s amended statement of claim contains 89 paragraphs. Over a third of those paragraphs deal with his failure to attend the Authority’s investigation meeting. After a brief summation of the background to the dispute, Mr Narayan claims four causes of u...
...home detention, but the response he then reported was that Mr Webby asked if he would agree to the amendment of the indictment to add three further charges. [23] It was Mr van der Zanden’s evidence that there was a connection between the two statements from which he drew the inference there would not be opposition to home detention. He accepts in his affidavit to the Tribunal that he made two errors in his affidavits to the Court of Appeal, firstly the September date and secondly...
...independent advice. [40] It became apparent in the course of the review hearing that Mr Singh’s earlier submissions had been misleading in important respects. [41] The day before the review hearing Mr Singh filed submissions and disclosed bank statements for QRS and EFG’s trust account which revealed his interest as a beneficiary of XYZ Trust, and XYZ’s role in funding QRS’s lending to Mr and Mrs NH. [42] The documents show that XYZ Trust paid $100,000 to QRS the day...