Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 141 E Tū Inc and ors v Carter Holt Harvey LVL Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...[25] Ms Tothill confirmed E Tū’s position the same day, expressing concern that Carter Holt LVL had made no effort to engage with E Tū on the matter since before the commencement of the Level 4 lockdown and saying that it would be seeking reinstatement of any leave debited during the lockdown. She noted that other employers had continued to consult and communicate with E Tū and its members during the lockdown and questioned why that had not been the case with Carter Holt LVL....

2. 26.-Evidence-of-Ms-Jo-Healy-Social-Impacts.PDF [PDF, 352 KB]

   ...ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-WLG-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource consent and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project By Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF JOANNE PATRICIA HEALY ON BEHALF OF WAKA KOTAHI NZ TRANSPORT...

3. LCRO 103/2022 RP v DQ (25 September 2024) [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...is yet to be fully signed and that your brother MK is acting as attorney, for your mother WK, under her property endu[r]ing powers of attorney. Enduring Power of Attorney – WK We understand that WK is represented by CY of [Law firm B] but has consented that we act for her in the sale transaction. We will be required to obtain all relevant documents from [Law firm B] in order to ensure that the EPA is properly invoked. … There has already been considerable emails and personal atte...

4. [2008] NZEmpC WC 18/08 Arthur D Riley & Co Ltd v Wood [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...of agreement between the parties as to costs the plaintiff is to file a memorandum within 28 days of this decision and the defendant has 14 days to respond in order to enable the Court to make a ruling on costs. Money paid into Court [69] By consent the company paid into Court the amounts awarded by the Authority. This may now be disbursed to the company together with any interest earned. C M SHAW JUDGE 6 Airbus UK Ltd...

5. Deputy Registrar - Te Keti A2 (2011) 15 Taitokerau MB 76 (15 TTK 76) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...assessed on the basis that the land was General land. As such we would not be in a position to support a change in the land status back to Māori Freehold land and are concerned that the change may erode the value of our security. [11] This statement reflects a misunderstanding of the nature of the application. It is not an application to change the status of the land but rather to declare its existing status. [12] The mortgagee and the trustees of the trust did not appear at the...

6. Witehira - Awarua A25 (2008) 128 Whangarei MB 282 (128 WH 282) [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...replacement of three existing tmstees and otherwise amended the application to be pursuant to section 23 I of the Act for a review of the trust. I issued directions as follows: "(2) Pllrsuant to secti01I 37(3) the application is amended by consent to a review of Tmsl pursuant 10 section23! a/the Act. PllrslIC1l1l1o section 238 the tnfstees are directed asfallows: (a) Shayne Wihongi is rofile with the COllrt by 30 November 2007 the proposed new Tntst Order alld the minules of the...

7. Skinner v Harawira - Estate of Maryanne Harawira [2016] Chief Judge's MB 207 (2016 CJ 207) [pdf, 407 KB]

   ...On 26 January 2010, in a letter to the Court the Māori Trustee advised they do not administer Paihia 1G2B1B block. Therefore, they do not have any client accounts which would be affected this application. Reference to areas of difficulty Consent by the Beneficiaries to the Vesting s164 18. The order complained of was made pursuant to section 164 of the Act. Under sub-section (8) it states: Section 164 (8) A person who is entitled to a beneficial interest in the land, or w...

8. White v Potroz - Mohakatino Parininihi No 1c West 3A2 [2016] Māori Appellate Court MB 143 (2016 APPEAL 143) [pdf, 479 KB]

   2016 Maori Appellate Court MB 143 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20150001176 APPEAL 2015/5 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal against orders of the Māori Land Court made on 21 November 2014 at 328 Aotea MB 225-237 in relation to Mohakatino Parininihi No 1C West 3A2 BETWEEN HAUMOANA WHITE Appellant AND ANGELA HELEN POTROZ, JOHN EDWARD POTROZ AND BARRY STUART KING

9. LCRO 119/2016 XY, ZW, QM, and ABC Lawyers v TQ (16 November 2018) [pdf, 466 KB]

   LCRO 119/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN XY, ZW, QM, and ABC LAWYERS Applicants AND TQ Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. 2 Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................

10. [2015] NZEmpC 92 Hally Labels Ltd v Powell [pdf, 426 KB]

    ...complied with 1 Hally Labels v Powell [2011] NZEmpC 60 (injunction); [2011] NZEmpC 63, [2011] ERNZ 233 (reasons). timetabling directions issued by Judge Travis), filed a fourth amended statement of claim prior to the commencement of the resumed hearing. The defendant filed an amended statement of defence to that statement of claim and included a counterclaim. [8] Just prior to the commencement of the resumed hearing, co...