5270 items matching your search terms
Methodology Report Cycle 5 (2021/22) ISSN 2744-5798 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excl
NZCVS Methodology Report 2023 (Cycle 6) June 2024 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all lia
Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity
Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity
Te Tāhū o te Ture Annual Report Including the Annual Report for Te Arawhiti, The Office for Ma-ori Crown Relations And Ministers’ reports on Non-Departmental Appropriations: Minister of Justice (Vote Justice), Minister for Courts (Vote Courts), Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations and Minister for Māori Crown Relations: Te Arawhiti (Vote Te Arawhiti) 1 July 2021 - 30 June 2022 E.64, B14 AR (2022) In accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989, this Annual Report presents:
...important aspect of the complaint. [50] In addition, the explanations regarding Ms Lozano’s reasons for not attending a meeting on 9 June 2011 did not satisfactorily explain inconsistent claims regarding that event. The 8 inconsistent statements were not obviously reconcilable without Ms Lozano or Mr Chang making false statements. The Gravity of Ms Lozano’s Situation [51] The Tribunal informed Ms Lozano that she had put herself in a situation where the Tribunal had...
CLAIM NO: 02089 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN: Warren Lewis and Bronwyn Lewis as Trustees of the Warren and Bronwyn Lewis Family Trust Claimants AND Auckland City Council First Respondent – Now Struck Out AND Compass Building Certification Ltd Second Respondent – Now Struck Out (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 18th September 2006 and 26th to 29th F
...Holland’s evidence, where uncorroborated. We find that the advances to herself amounted to at least $200,000 and may have been as much as $285,000. [31] In oral evidence in March 2018, Ms Holland was asked why she had not obtained copies of bank statements to expose her estate dealings. She said “I haven’t but I could do that.”26 Almost four years have elapsed and she has not provided any such documentation. We do not know, for example, whether her father’s estate fund...
...them at the time of the negotiations. His evidence was that he raised the issue of his salary “amongst many things” with his lawyer at the time but did not raise them with DeloitteAsparona. [83] It is material that in addition to the general statement about full and final settlement, the clause contains a specific acknowledgement from Mr AlKazaz himself that the terms are reached in full and final settlement. [84] Given his knowledge at the time and his specific acknowledgeme...
...adversely affected by the orders complained of because of an error in the evidence presented to the Court. The affidavit of Te Hei Pirika dated 16 August 2007 filed in support of the application sets out his grounds for the application: (a) That the statement made by Maureen Elizabeth Mita (the deceased’s wife) at the hearing of 28 January 1988 at 83 South Island MB 76 that Ngahuia Jade Mita was legally adopted by the deceased was incorrect; and (b) That Ngahuia Jade Mita was wh...