5297 items matching your search terms
Directory of Official Information Listings M-O About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma
...members. • The CE Act contains the accountability relationships between entities, board members, responsible Ministers and the House of Representatives. • As a Crown Agency, Kāinga Ora must give effect to Government policy directions, prepare a Statement of Intent, prepare a statement of performance expectations and prepare and publish an annual report. The CE Act also restricts how it may borrow, invest, and establish subsidiaries. Kāinga Ora - Homes and Communities Act 2019...
Directory of Official Information Listings S-U About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz ma
...victims. Prior to the court appearance, VAs explain the FV Court process to victims, encourage them to attend the hearing, and keep them informed of progress of their case. A VA is present at every FV Court hearing, and provides the judge with a written statement incorporating a victim’s view, and which has been drafted with input from victims. This statement indicates whether the complainant will be in the FV Court and if they are willing to be identified. In addition, VAs at the Manukau...
EMMA GYENGE V CLIFFORD LAMAR LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEMPC 1 [10 January 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEMPC 1 ARC 65/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN EMMA GYENGE Plaintiff AND CLIFFORD LAMAR LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 10 November 2010 11 November 2010 22 November 2010 Appearances: Jan Gyenge, Agent for Plaintiff Clifford Harris, Agent for Defendant Ju
...could be removed from the Register, at a prompt hearing which was scheduled to take place on 25 August 2016. At such a hearing, all affected parties could be heard. [6] In its further application, LSG also sought orders: a) That Ms Alim’s statement of claim including her claim for costs be struck out, and that her challenge to the costs determination made by the Authority also be struck out, on the basis she had repeatedly failed to comply with the Court’s orders as to disc...
...June 2007 a joint hearings committee of the Whakatane District Council and Environment Bay of Plenty heard an application by Tuhoe Putaiao to undertake gravel extraction along the upper reaches of the Whakatane River. Prior to and at the resource consent hearing, Tuhoe Putaiao was supported by Te Tawa Kaiti. On 10 July 2007 Tuhoe Putaiao were granted a resource consent which permits them to extract up to 50,000 m 3 of gravel from the Whakatane River. [5] Since late 2007, Tuhoe Pu...
...2A2A should be left out of the Otanemutu Lands Trust because she thought her sister’s family (the Lanigans) could carry on farming the block. She later accepted what the Court did because provision was made for William Lanigan. [8] With the consent of William Lanigan, his brother Ben Lanigan became a co-occupier of the residence during William Lanigan’s lifetime and Ben continued in occupation after Bill died. The Otanemutu Trustees allowed the occupation to continue. On the d...
...sell her property at 19 Kahikatea Street, Inglewood, the Defendant published a testimonial on the website open2view.com, and/or in promotional flyers, for his Ray White franchise, purportedly from Julie Smillie, without Julie Smillie’s knowledge or consent.” [28] Charge 5 alleges that the Defendant published a testimonial purporting to be from Julie Smillie when Ms Smillie neither knew of nor consented to this. [29] The relevant witnesses are: Julie Smillie and Gerald Gallacher....
...the fee was not fair and reasonable. Rule 1.04 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Barristers and Solicitors provides: 12 A practitioner shall not act for more than one party in the same transaction or matter without the prior informed consent of all parties. Mr Austell breached r 1.04 when he undertook the work of a lawyer for both Ms Somerset and Y in relation to the separation agreement. In so doing he also failed to address the conflict of interest in the manner set ou...