5270 items matching your search terms
Q v THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 57 [7 May 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 57 CRC 8/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN Q Plaintiff AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Defendant Hearing: (26-30 January, 2-5 and 12-13 February 2015) (heard at Christchurch) Appearances: A Shaw, J Behrnes and M Dutkiewicz, co
...consumers and promote the purposes of the Act. He puts it that appellants are not required to pay any filing fee to bring an appeal, nor is there any difficulty about the form of appeal (when compared, say, to 8 the requirements of filing a statement of claim in the Courts), and it is relatively easy for a lay litigant to bring an appeal to us under the Act and, in these circumstances, requiring appeals to be brought within 20 working days is not onerous. [31] Mr Hodge observe...
...dredging zone and three samples beyond the dredging zone but still in the marina footprint for testing of heavy metals. Three hardshore sites were inspected for information on what organisms would be likely to colonise the marina breakwaters. Many statements have been assumed rather than tested. For example, water quality measurements were not taken but were inferred and there was no survey of fish life. There is an over reliance on visual observation rather than comprehensive scientif...
...addresses and would have had sufficient time to present these proxies to the Court; and (c) 9 of these 24 were also invalid due to the forms being incorrectly completed. [14] The second notice of the meeting sent to owners had the following statement: “POSTAL votes and PROXY forms must be received by the Court by 4pm Friday 11 September 2015,...” [15] The proxy form itself stated in the notes on the reverse side of the document that the proxy form must be lodged with the...
...December 2013 states that on 22 January 2013 an updated signing authority was received removing Mr Puriri and adding a Ms Manning. Then on 11 March 2013 the January change to the signing authority was reversed on notice that Mr Puriri had not consented to the change. Accordingly his role as signatory was reinstated. To put the point beyond doubt, Arama Puriri is the only person authorised as responsible trustee to operate the trust bank account. [37] For the future, and excludi...
...and responsibilities but “went rogue” under pressure and feelings of sympathy for the purchasers needing possession of a home. The Committee’s Decision [31] The Committee determined that releasing the keys to the purchasers, without the consent of the complainant or her solicitor, was a breach of r.9.1 of the Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2009. Rule 9.1 provides: “A licensee must act in the best interests of a client and act in accordance...
...visitation rights. The application [7] The grounds upon which Mr Davis has made application for a rehearing are: (a) The Court was biased in its decision against the applicant. (b) That the Court failed to consider relevant evidence and statements. (c) That disparities in the respondent's evidence were ignored by the Court in making their (sic) decision. (d) That some of the facts relied on by the Employment Court in its decision are incorrect and/or misinte...
...Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s.107 of the Act BETWEEN JAMES ALGIE AND OTHERS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent HEARING On the papers by consent AUTHORITY Robyn Bedford COUNSEL J Miller for appellant; P McBride for respondent/applicant DECISION GRANTING APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT AND SUBMISSION IN SUPPORT OF AUTHORITY’S RIGHT TO BE...
...lots of individual blocks and individual public works takings will not. In this way, the things that really matter to most people will be all that is inquired into. Claimant and Crown research will be carried out simultaneously, followed by a Crown statement of posi- tion on the big-picture issues. The Tribunal will then define the issues for its hearings. At this point, claimants and the Crown would be free to decide that they had enough material on which to start negotiations. Other-...
...can't go across because of this tie up in the Court system, I wish the ones that I actually bought would go across to Michael because I did buy them. They're not actually inheritance issue. " [13] I note here that Jack Bames' statement is at odds with the Court record when Matekino Rangiuia transfen'ed the interests to Jack Bal1les on 20 March 1987 as it is recorded by the COUli that (18 AT 73) " Mr Bames will set aside this land for all my family as...