LCRO 104/2016 and LCRO 192/2016 LP v PR (27 June 2019) [pdf, 223 KB]
...meaning that the notion of a reverse brief cannot or should not be considered 12. The Committee asserts in paragraph 41 that Mrs YL “had met and discussed the matters with Mr LP on a number of occasions” but there is no evidence to support such a statement other than submissions from Mrs YL. Mrs YL’s position has been refuted but the submissions provided by Mrs YL appear to be considered with a greater weight in the Committee’s decision 13. In paragraph 42 the Committee noted...