Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal - District 11 Wairarapa [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT llA WAIRARAPA PAUL GOLDSMITH JUL Y 1996 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District 13: The Northern South Island, Dr G A Phillipson FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys conunissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal

2. Wai 1040 Northland inquiry index [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Te Arai, Te Arai and Mangawhai sea coast which resource resource is the property of the tangatawhenua claimants. Enacting legislation known as the Resource Management Act 1991 which Act. Extraction of sand resources from the sea bed without express consent of tangatawhenua. Diversity property rights including log harvesting rights and whether by lease in the land known as Mangawhai State Forest. Mangawhai in the north, extending to Waiwera in the South, thence to Aotea in the east from there...

3. Directory of Official Information G-I [pdf, 858 KB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings G-I About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz

4. Ruapuha and Uekaha Hapu Trust v Tane - Hauturu East 8 Block [2010] 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 512 (2010 APPEAL 512) [pdf, 226 KB]

   RUAPUHA AND UEKAHA HAPU TRUST V TANE MAC A20080016920 2 November 2010 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT 2010 MAORI APPELLATE COURT MB 512 (2010 APPEAL 512) A20080016920 A20080016617 UNDER Section 59, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Hauturu East 8 Block BETWEEN RUAPUHA AND UEKAHA HAPU TRUST Appellant AND NORMAN TANE Appellant Coram: Judge A D Spencer Judge L R Harvey Judge D J Ambler Appear

5. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 64 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   Waitangi Tribunal ANGI TE ROPU WHAKAMANA I TE TIRITI O WAITANGI Haratua 2012 | May 2012 ˉ ˉ 1 Issue 64Kia puta ki te whai ao ki te ao mā̄rama From the world of darkness moving into the world of light| Kei Roto | Inside From the Chairperson 1 From the Director 2 New Tribunal Leadership 2 New Members and Presiding Officers 3 Our Distinguished Membership 5 Departing Members 6 New Registrar 6 Urgency and Remedies Applications 7 Professor Sorrenson’s 24 Years’ Service 7 The

6. Ruapuha Uekaha Hapu Trust - Hauturu East 8 Block (2008) 134 Waikato MB 3 (134 W 3) [pdf, 10 MB]

   IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIIUTO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT Hearing: 134 W AIIU TO MB 3 A20060026843 A20060002649 IN THE MATTER OF Hauturu East 8 Block AND An application for review oftrust UNDER Section 231, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 AND UNDER RUAPUHA UEKAHA HAPU TRUST Applicant An application for enforcement of obligations of trust and review of trust Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 NORMANTANE Applicant 16 October 2007, 127 Waikato MB 259-3

7. [2023] NZEmpC 89 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Prisha’s Hospitality (2017) Ltd T/A Royal Cambridge Indian Restaurant [pdf, 787 KB]

   A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT v PRISHA’S HOSPITALITY (2017) LIMITED TRADING AS ROYAL CAMBRIDGE INDIAN RESTAURANT [2023] NZEmpC 89 [16 June 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 89 EMPC 450/2019 IN THE MATTER OF minimum employment standards – applications for exercise of powers under Part 9A of the Employment Relations Act 200

8. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v Parlane [2010] NZLCDT 8 [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...over acting for Mrs R, any conflict that might have existed was thereafter cured. Furthermore, he said that on two occasions he had told Mrs R that she could get another lawyer to look over the documents but that would cost more money. These statements appear to have been made after the arrangements to purchase had been made. At no time did Mr Parlane provide evidence of the clear and unequivocal statement to Mrs R of her right to independent advice that is expected of a solici...

9. Trustees of Owhaoko C Trust v Karena - Owhaoko C Trust (2017) 59 Takitimu MB 288 (59 TKT 288) [pdf, 436 KB]

   ...(2015) 337 Aotea MB 68 (337 AOT 68) at [22] to [26] 59 Tākitimu MB 294 (b) is likely to cause prejudice or delay; or (c) is frivolous or vexatious; or (d) is otherwise an abuse of the process of the court. (2) If the court strikes out a statement of claim or a counterclaim under subclause (1), it may by the same or a subsequent order dismiss the proceeding or the counterclaim. (3) Instead of striking out all or part of a pleading under subclause (1), the court may stay a...

10. [2024] NZEmpC 226 Glenfield College BOT & Ors v Anderson [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...cross-examination, this was the sort of inquiry that cl 2.5 of the CEA envisages being made prior to decisions being made. [31] It was around this point in time that communications between the parties deteriorated. Mediation was not pursued and a statement of problem was filed with the Authority. The statement of problem alleged that the proposal to reduce Mrs Anderson’s hours by 50 per cent would, if proceeded with, amount to a redundancy and that the Board was acting in a way...