Search Results

1. [2024] NZEmpC 226 Glenfield College BOT & Ors v Anderson [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...cross-examination, this was the sort of inquiry that cl 2.5 of the CEA envisages being made prior to decisions being made. [31] It was around this point in time that communications between the parties deteriorated. Mediation was not pursued and a statement of problem was filed with the Authority. The statement of problem alleged that the proposal to reduce Mrs Anderson’s hours by 50 per cent would, if proceeded with, amount to a redundancy and that the Board was acting in a way...

2. Directory of Official Information 2019 G-I [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings G-I About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz

3. Cotter v Cotter - Tutaekuri B13 [2019] Chief Judge's MB 951 (2019 CJ 951) [pdf, 471 KB]

   ...directed: 1. Complete Preliminary Report and Recommendation and send to all parties for any objections: 2. The hearing to remain for 25 February 2019, unless Counsel is unavailable and agree to a different timetable for filing, and file such by consent subject to the Courts availability; and 3. The case manager to work in with Counsel of courts availability. On 29 January 2019, the Courts directions of 22 January 2019, the case manager’s preliminary report and recomm...

4. FMI v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claim for Cover for Mental Injury) [2025] NZACC 062 [pdf, 375 KB]

   ...specified offences15 and no filming offences are expressly included. (b) Posting the intimate visual recording in RV v ACC16 qualified not because any filming crime qualified under Schedule 3. It was because the deceit of the recording vitiated consent and the then non-consensual sexual intercourse was within an express Schedule 3 description of either sexual violation or sexual assault. (c) There is no need in this case to make the offence “fit” within the list in Schedule...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 100 NZ Language Centres Ltd Etc v Page [pdf, 241 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LANGUAGE CENTRES LTD (FORMERLY GEOS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED) v DAVID PAGE NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 100 [5 June 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 100 ARC 68/10 IN THE MATTER OF AND IN THE MATTER a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority of remedies and costs BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND LANGUAGE CENTRES LIMITED (FORMERLY GEOS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED) Plaintiff AND DAVID PAGE Def

6. McClelland v Schindler Lifts NZ Ltd [2015] NZHRRT 45 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...each question requires the applicant to make a self-assessment. The questions are not phrased more directly as in: • Do you have a medical or physical problem? If “Yes”, please provide details. [20] In the same form Mr McClelland gave his consent to attending a nominated medical doctor if requested. Schindler never required him to undergo an examination even though the tremor in his hand was cited at the termination meeting as a safety issue. [21] These points are mentioned...

7. Whānau Protect (National Home Safety Service) evaluation report [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   Whānau Protect National Home Safety Service Evaluation report Provider & Community Services Ministry of Justice November 2017 Disclaimer This research was undertaken by Provider and Community Services within the Ministry of Justice, with assistance from Gravitas Research and Strategy Limited. The Ministry acknowledges and thanks the National Collective of Independent Women’s Refuges, and their affiliated and associated refuges who helped with and

8. [2013] NZEmpC 81 Brake v Grace Team Accounting Ltd [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...in the possible disestablishment of a number of roles, based on the last on/first off criteria. It confirmed what she had been told, namely that GTA did not bring in the revenue it had expected and that costs had also gone up and it attached a statement of the turnover and wages bill for the years ending 2009 and 2010. Without setting out the full figures it showed the turnover was down by $99,799 in 2010 from 2009 and the wages were up by $19,084. [35] The letter stated that...

9. Vivash v Accident Compensation Corporation [2020] NZHRRT 16 [pdf, 282 KB]

   Reference No. HRRT 029/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN STUART HAROLD VIVASH PLAINTIFF AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION DEFENDANT AT PALMERSTON NORTH BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member Ms ST Scott QSM, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr SH Vivash in person Mr D Tuiqereqere for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 10, 11 and 12 June 2019 DATE OF DECISION: 27 May 2020 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1

10. 2019 Directory of Official Information G-I [pdf, 916 KB]

    Directory of Official Information Listings G-I Author Version number Date About This is a living document; we endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz Ministerial Services Strategy, Governance & Finance mailto:official.correspondenc