5270 items matching your search terms
Directory of Official Information Listings G-I About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz
Directory of Official Information Listings G-I About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz
Directory of Official Information Listings G-I About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz
Directory of Official Information Listings G-I About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz
E.64 (2014) Annual Report 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 http://www.justice.govt.nz/ http://www.justice.govt.nz/ Am ou nt co llected each year $4million THROUGH THE OFFENDER LEVY $218million IN FINES & REPARATION SETTLED OF HISTORICAL CLAIMS TREATY56 TO OVER COMMUNITY LAW CENTRES GAVE LEGAL ADVICE 48,000PEOPLE ASSISTANCE& IN THE LAST 3 YEARS RECORDED DROPPED 17 DROPPED 33 8.9% REDUCTION IN THE AVERAGE AGE OF ACTIVE DISTRICT COURT CASES 18.3% REDUCTION IN THE AVERAGE
Evaluation of Family Dispute Resolution Service and Mandatory Self-representation Qualitative Research Findings Preface This research was undertaken by the Research and Evaluation Team of the Ministry of Justice and two contracted researchers, Nan Wehipeihana and Tolotea Lanumata. The Ministry of Justice acknowledges and thanks the parents and key informants who willingly gave their time to participate in the research.
1 1 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely
[bookmark: _GoBack] 2 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information. ISBN 978-0-
...solicitor. He noted that all other clients to whom he had sold apartments in the building had instructed Ms SX to act on their behalf. By this time of course, Ms SX had already resumed acting for them. [25] HI Law then sent the settlement statement to Ms SX advising that settlement was scheduled for 20 November. Apparently without instruction, Ms SX sought an extension of the settlement date due to the fact that finance had not been arranged. [26] No extension was agreed, an...
...matters. [22] When the Adviser completed his case, the Tribunal examined him on the material presented. He was examined under oath. [23] The Adviser’s case was not presented under oath. The Tribunal raised with him what status his oral unsworn statements should have. He accepted his case should form part of the Tribunal’s record. While the fact some of the evidence was not on oath could have a bearing of the weight to be given, no finding in this decision turns on that. [24] The o...