Search Results

1. Warin - Whangaruru Whakaturia 4 Lot 32 DP 126453 (Part) 30 Taitokerau MB 37 (30 TTK 37) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...[39] Mr Peters then emphasised that, like Part XIV of the Act which was considered in Brown v Māori Appellate Court 11 , Part VI of the Act is also not a self contained code. That is, of course, correct. [40] Mr Peters then pointed to two statements from the High Court in Brown v Māori Appellate Court which underpinned his central argument that the 1993 Act does not promote the retention of land by non-Māori and that it is incongruous for the Court to leave land owned by non-...

2. Waitangi Tribunal theme Q - Foreshore [pdf, 559 KB]

   Rangahaua Whanui Nat ional Theme q THE FORESHORE RICHARD P BOAST November 1996 Firs t Release WA I T A N G I TR I B U N A L R A N G A H A U A W H A N U I S E R I E S Other Rangahaua Whanui reports District reports District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Hamer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 8: The Alienation of Maori Land in the Rohe Potae, C Marr District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District 11a: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith District 11

3. Evaluation of Victim Support Services [pdf, 810 KB]

   1 Evaluation of Victim Support services Alison Chetwin, Trish Young, Elaine Mossman, Sue Carswell with Sue Triggs Final report July 2018 2 Acknowledgements The evaluators would like to give special thanks to Victim Support’s clients and others who took part in interviews for this evaluation. We’d also like to thank the Victim Support staff in Christchurch, Hutt Valley, Lakes Hub/Bay of Plent

4. Te-Iwi-o-Ngati-Tukorehe-Trust-Cultural-Impact-Assessment-v2.pdf [pdf, 4.3 MB]

   TIONTT Version 4 Draft                                                                       Date: 5th October 2022                                                                      Page 1 of 36                Te Iwi ō Ngāti Tukorehe Trust Cultural Impact Assessment of NZ  Transport Agency (Te Waka Kotahi) pro

5. Ngati Pahauwera Supplementary Affidavit on behalf of Trustees Exhibits B to H [pdf, 15 MB]

   t v-.v" v n x - : vte? /v \ \ ■ , x \ ■'/ \ V v"* / \ \ x \ V ‘ / S v/ U D JjB r i A \ A N'> X : ■ A W \ V " V \ : , •' V K/ \ \ •. \ ; •' \ H > - ; \ V V. > I A s '/>< jr fX. / fir** : ' / \ \ x \ \ \ \V>c \ 4 \ . \ > ^ f j,' X U-- ' • . A X / / > ■ • \ 4 s \ ; \ \ . \ • ■ X , ' A " : ' / ,■ s' \ Y \ y ' - / \ x'.'

6. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 1 Tauranga Moana [pdf, 13 MB]

   T   A   U    R    A     N    G     A  M   O  A     N     A 1  8  8  6    –    2  0  0  6 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W  A  I  T A  N    G 

7. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v O'Boyle [2021] NZLCDT 15 (29 April 2021) [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...2018, sent to four recipients. Additionally, they touch on allegedly misleading representations she made to the Standards Committee. [2] The Standards Committee submits that the letters were inappropriate and unbalanced, that they contained misstatements, and were designed to cause employment troubles for the affected persons. Ms O’Boyle’s case is that she took reasonable care to get her facts right, that she had honest if mistaken beliefs, and that she was acting on instruc...

8. Morehu v Māori Trustee - Tokerau A14B2 (2007) 313 Rotorua MB 256 (313 ROT 256) [pdf, 6.7 MB]

   ...applicant asselis that there was a clear stipulation to the Maori Trustee that the deceased was selling his land to Te Mata Morehu. However, there is no evidence to justify that assertion. Mr Rika does not confirm any such thing. Similarly the statement that the deceased was not aware of nor did he agree to hi s land being transferred to the Maori Trustee absolutely. What is clear is that he sold hi s shares to the Maori Trustee and was paid for them at their true value; (q) the Mao...

9. NZCVS Methodology Report Cycle 3 (2020) [pdf, 4.9 MB]

   Methodology Report Cycle 3 (2019/20) ISSN 2744-5798 Published in June 2021 By The Ministry of Justice Justice Centre, 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088, Wellington, New Zealand T: +64 4 918 8800 F: +64 4 918 8820 E: NZCVS@justice.govt.nz W: www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/research-data/nzcvs Suggested citation Ministry of Justice. 2021. New Zeala

10. [2011] NZEmpC 164 Taylor v Milburn Lime Limited [pdf, 102 KB]

    ...did. Following a period of tense silence, Mr Taylor said he was leaving. Each witness gave a different account of the exact words he used. It is very likely that Mr Taylor used the expression “I’m out of here” but what accompanied that statement is far from clear. He did not use the word “resign” or “quit”. Mr Taylor’s evidence was that he had said the situation was getting too heated and that he would sort it out when Mr Mahan got back. Mr Manson’s evidence...