5269 items matching your search terms
DECISION www.epa.govt.nz Application for the Reassessment of a Group of Hazardous Substances under Section 63 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 26 June 2013 APP201051: Antifouling paints containing any of the following: 3(2H)-Isothiazolone, 4,5-dichloro-2-octyl- (DCOIT), chlorothalonil, copper (I) oxide, copper pyrithione, copper thiocyanate, dichlofluanid, diuron, irgarol 1051, mancozeb, octhilin
Crown/Māori Relations Summary of Submissions Te ara whakamua ā tātou Our path ahead Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully exclude
...system, and computer equipment. 5. Record Keeping: keeping statutory documents up-to-date. For example, maintaining and updating documentation of legally required activities such as emergency plans, logbooks, copies of permits, taxation and business statements, drawing up business plans and programs. New Zealand Assessment of Business Compliance Costs of the Indicative Anti-Money Laundering Regulatory Requirements 11 6. Enforcement: cooperating with audits, inspections and...
Takutai Moana Application Affidavits 2013/2014 No. Affidavit - Name Page 1 Adsett, James William 2 2 Adsett, Nell 7 3 Aranui, Gerald Brenton 8 4 Aranui, Maraea 14 5 Aranui, Tiwana 22 6 Bishop, David 27 7 Botica, Darren 60 8 Culshaw, Colin 64 9 Culshaw, William Henry 97 10 Edwards, Raymond Russell 113 11 Gadsby, Bella Carol 118 12 Gemmell, Arthur Thorpe 121 13 Green, Kuki 128 14 Halliday, Stuart 131 15 Hamilton, Hiro 136 16 Hape, Vilma Marie 143 17 Hawkins, A
41 Takitimu MB 102 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TĀKITIMU DISTRICT A20080006586 A20100012206 A20140005905 UNDER Sections 37, 231, 237,238 and 240 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF The Tataraakina C Trust BETWEEN HENARE TONGARIRO PUWAI RĀTIMA Applicant AND GEORGE SULLIVAN, HORO EDWARDS, IVY KAHUKIWA SMITH, JOHN WANO, AND TANIA HUATA KUPA AS TRUSTEES OF THE TATARAAKINA C TRUST Respondents Hearings: 12 T
He Hïnätore ki te Ao Mäori A Glimpse into the Mäori World Mäori Perspectives on Justice First published in March 2001 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand ���Crown Copyright ISSN 0-478-50156-7 i Acknowledgements E ngä mana, e ngä reo, e ngä karangatanga maha. Tënä koutou, tënä koutou, tënä koutou. Kai te mihi atu, kai te tangi atu, ki te iti, ki te rahi, kua wehe ake ki te pö mai i tënä whäruarua, i tënä whäruarua awhio atu i
...and RMTU) raising its concerns about their lack of response to its 3 July letter and offering a final meeting with a working party to conclude the policy and a process for its implementation. MUNZ proposed that each party should have a policy statement with a procedure to be agreed between them. At a meeting MUNZ tabled its suggested procedure which claimed to have taken account of ESR’s comments but in which no changes had been made. [24] On 30 October 2006 MUNZ lodged its lo...
102 Taitokerau MB 1 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20130008950 UNDER Section 26C, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An application by Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee Limited for reference of Māori fisheries dispute between Te Rūnanga Nui o Te Aupōuri and Ngāti Kuri, Ngāi Takoto and Te Rarawa - referred under s 182(4), Māori Fisheries Act 2004 BETWEEN TE OHU KAIMOANA TRUSTEE LIMITED Applicant AND
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2012] NZREADT 34 READT 050/10 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 10007) Complainant/Prosecutor AND JANINE WALLACE Defendant MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Ms J Robson - Member Mr G Denley - Member HEARD at AUCKLAND on 27 and 28 March 2012 DATE OF DECISION: 18 June 2012 COUNSEL Mr S Wi
DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The applicants have applied for a review of a decision of the [City] Standards Committee [X] in which the Committee determined to take no further action in respect to their complaints against Mr AW. Background [2] In November 2005, Mr AW received instructions to act for eight shareholders of the DEF Ltd. [3] DEF Ltd, a company formally register