Search Results

1. [2024] NZEmpC 60 Lanigan v Fonterra Brands (New Zealand) Ltd [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...The application is granted. [7] The application proposed a timetable for amended pleadings if it succeeded. The timetable was consented to by the plaintiffs and defendant. Applying that timetable I order as follows: (a) A further amended statement of claim, incorporating the claims of all of the plaintiffs against the defendant, is to be filed and served within 21 days of the date of this judgment. (b) An amended statement of defence (if any) is to be filed and served within...

2. [2019] NZEnvC 125 Schmuck v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...J Kidman and T Dunn in person - s274 parties in support of Mr Schmuck Date of Decision: 26 July 2019 Date of Issue: : · . :: :; } :. ?'U [9 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: The applicant is to provide a draft set of conditions and consent in accordance with this decision to the Regional Council and s274 parties within 30 working days; the Council and parties are to respond to the applicant within a further 20 working days; the applicant is then to provide his final word...

3. 5 November 2018 Lindis Catchment Group Incorporated v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 608 KB]

   ...Council Appeal By Submitter On Proposed Policy Statement Or Plan pursuant to Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource ManaQement Act 1991 Court Reference: ENV-2016-CHC-000061 2. Topic: Topic Number: Application for a suite of resource consents to replace water permits that expire in 2021 ENV-2018-309·000003 i. Lindis Catchment Group Incorporated v Otago Regional Council Direct Referral From Consent Authority Of Resource Consent Application pursuant to Section 87 of the...

4. Chand v Rana [2014] NZIACDT 47 (08 April 2014) [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...applications. [2] He says he had a written agreement to complete one application and was to lodge the other two without cost. [3] Complications followed and there was an additional fee of $500 for additional work, but the complainant did not give written consent to the additional fee. [4] The Registrar lodged a Statement of Complaint that identified only potential deficiencies in the written agreement, and a failure to obtain written consent for the additional fees of $500. [5] The a...

5. E64 Angela Bull - EIC - VHHL [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV-2018-AKL-000078 UNDER the Resource Mangement Act 1991 IN THE MATTER of the direct referral of applications for resource consent for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America's Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND Applicant A N D AUCKLAND COUNCIL Regulatory Authority STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF ANGELA BULL ON BEHALF OF VIADUCT HARBOUR HOLDINGS LIM...

6. [2024] NZEnvC 290 Save the Maitai Inc v Nelson City Council [pdf, 736 KB]

   ...spatial controls over development. 3 Methods RE3.9.ii Identification of the Malvern Hills, Botanical Hill and Kākā Hill landscape units within the Maitahi/Mahitahi Bayview Structure Plan and using zoning, overlays and the resource consenting process, guided by assessment criteria, as a package to manage, protect and enhance the area’s landscape, visual and natural character values. RE3.9.iii Specific rules to restrict the building form, colour, and landscaping...

7. E67 Vaughan Smith - Planning - EIC - VHHL [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV-2018-AKL-000078 UNDER the Resource Mangement Act 1991 IN THE MATTER of the direct referral of applications for resource consent for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America's Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND Applicant A N D AUCKLAND COUNCIL Regulatory Authority STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF VAUGHAN SMITH ON BEHALF OF VIADUCT HARBOUR HO...

8. [2021] NZEnvC 168 Director-General of Conservation v Thames-Coromandel District Council [pdf, 454 KB]

   ...joint witness statement prepared by the appellant’s planner Mr T R Christie and the planning consultant called by PowerCo Limited Ms C L Cleary, as to the relevant statutory background. We have also considered evidence-in-chief and rebuttal statements by them. It is important to point to a primary objective and two policies in s 6 of the PDP (Biodiversity), settled by previous decisions on the appeal by the Director-General and some consent orders. In some respects, they supers...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 76 Harlow v Western Property Management Ltd [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...order against all three respondents. Costs will lie where they fall. [15] If Ms Harlow wishes to continue her actions for penalties both in the proceedings filed in this Court and the proceedings now removed from the Authority, then an amended statement of claim consolidating all actions is to be filed within 14 days. The second respondent (Tony Teague) and third respondent (West Management Ltd) will have 14 days from service of the amended statement of claim to file st...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 143 Sawyer v Victoria University [pdf, 164 KB]

    ...respect of the record of settlement and penalties.5 In response to that application steps were taken on Dr Sawyer’s behalf by her then lawyer which resulted in a further determination of the Authority, dated 3 March 2017, recorded as being by consent.6 [7] On 3 March 2017 Dr Sawyer’s lawyer had sent an email to the Authority, and to counsel representing the Vice-Chancellor, which was said to convey Dr Sawyer’s consent to a compliance order.7 [8] The Authority acted on that...