Search Results

1. Simons Pass Station Limited [pdf, 624 KB]

   ...and 15.1.1 of the Mackenzie District Plan, and the associated plan definitions; 5.2. Whether the exemptions to Rules 12.1.1.g and 12.1.1.h give effect to the objectives and policies in Chapter 9 and Chapter 12 of the Canterbury Regional Policy Statement; 5.3. Whether resource consent is required under Clause 12 of the Mackenzie District Plan for pastoral intensification. 6. Simons Pass Station Limited opposes all of the declarations sought because: General 6.1. The Mackenzie Dist...

2. [2016] NZEmpC 26 Ale v Kids At Home Limited [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...submissions in advance of the hearing. This helped clarify the plaintiff’s position. It was submitted on her behalf that aspects of the process complained about were part of an ongoing grievance; alternatively that the defendant had impliedly consented to a disadvantage grievance relating to the performance appraisal process being pursued out of time; and if not these events were part of the relevant evidential background. 3 V...

3. Ryang v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 21 [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...building inspector at the time of undertaking inspections with this home. Mr Stone indicated that a number of the re-checks were due to Council concerns over workmanship issues. The Council inspection notes are comprehensive and include a producer statement that the cladding was compliant and a number of product and application “guarantees” which the Council accepted as producer statements. [35] Mrs Ryang engaged Mr R W Cartwright, a former Council building inspector,...

4. [2007] NZEmpC WC 15/07 Auto-Movements (NZ) Ltd v Eveleigh [pdf, 52 KB]

   ...Auckland and Wellington. In September 1996 Auto-Movements purchased this business from Mr Eveleigh who had established it. [8] The sale was accompanied by a restraint of trade. Although this was not produced in evidence it was quoted in the statement of claim and not denied. It restrained Mr Eveleigh for five years until September 2001 from being “directly or indirectly engaged, interested or concerned whether on the Respondent’s own account or as a shareholder, Director or...

5. [2012] NZEmpC 54 Maritime Union of NZ Inc v Ports of Auckland [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...any other contractor employed or engaged by the defendant to cease any form of advertising, training or recruitment or any form of preparation for those activities on behalf of the defendant or otherwise. (v) The defendant will not make any statement to, or which could, encourage any union member to seek or accept employment with the contractors identified in (iv) above. (vi) In the event that the defendant intends to employ or engage any other person to perform work cover...

6. Matenga - Parish of Tahawai Lot 18C-F and 18I (2003) 73 Tauranga MB 150 (73 T 150) [pdf, 660 KB]

   ...the same year as the house was built. It should be noted here that although legal ownership of the block is with the trustees, de facto control of the block appears to reside with the runanga and the Bryan whanau, at least in matters of granting consent for access and occupation of the land. Some members of the runanga also appear to belong to a group called Te Taumata 0 Te Koti Aroha of Hapu Sovereign Courts, who purported to have authority to issue a trespass notice to the occupant...

7. Williams v Police (Strike-Out Application No. 2) [2020] NZHRRT 26 [pdf, 696 KB]

   ...if the interests in disclosure 13 outweigh the privacy interests of the person concerned. The alleged domestic violence background was in the present case made relevant by the terms of the request. [62] Emphasis was also given to certain statements in the statement of reply filed by the Police in March 2016. It is important to note, however, that at the time the document was filed neither Mr Williams nor Ms Christine Scott of the North Shore Policing Centre, Auckland (the author...

8. Atkins & Ors as Trustees of the Bruce Family Trust v North Shore City Council [pdf, 284 KB]

   ...territorial authority, the first respondent, the North Shore City Council, and building consent number BG5328 was given on 30 November 1994. There were various inspections during construction by officers of the Council and Field Memoranda and Producer Statements issued. The Code Compliance Certificate for both units was issued by the Council on 29 April 1996. 4.4 The title to unit B shows that it was transferred to A W & L A Godfrey registered 12 January 1996 and then to...

9. Ashworth v Kent (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 55 [pdf, 475 KB]

   ...surgical treatment plan was to correct the left eye for long distance vision by creating a thin flap, and to create a thick flap in her right eye and place a KAMRA inlay underneath the thick flap to improve her near vision. Mrs Ashworth provided written consent for this treatment plan and consented to receiving the KAMRA inlay in her right eye. 2. After receiving her consent, Dr Kent proceeded with the surgery, and [the Registered Nurse (RN)] programmed the laser. [The RN] accidentally...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 052 Lakeside Developments 2017 Limited v Waikato District Council [pdf, 368 KB]

    ...Appellant AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AND KIWIRAIL HOLDINGS LIMITED Section 274 party Court: Alternate Environment Judge L J Newhook sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Last case event: Joint memorandum in support of consent order dated 16 February 2024 Date of Order: 25 March 2024 Date of Issue: 25 March 2024 _________________________________________________________________ CONSENT ORDER _______________________________________________________...