Search Results

1. MLC 2019 January - OCR Outstanding Applications [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405-407 and 92 WHK 250- 251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona K...

2. McDonald v Peters [2012] NZWHT Auckland 39 [pdf, 215 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-101-000025 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 39 BETWEEN GREGORY JOHN McDONALD Claimant AND TIMOTHY EDWARD PETERS First Respondent AND BUILDING APPROVALS AND SOLUTIONS LIMITED Second Respondent AND MIKE HISLOP Third Respondent AND NEILL BROWN Fourth Respondent AND CARLTON RICHARDS Fifth Respondent AND NELSON CITY COUNCIL (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND GRAEME SCOTT (Removed) Seventh Respondent AND PHILIP...

3. 2019 01 28 March Outstanding Applications [pdf, 361 KB]

   ...Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405-407 and 92 WHK 250- 251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona K...

4. Sanders v King - Part Parish of Whangape Lot 15B Block and Parish of Whangape Lot 15C (Urupa) (2014) 81 Waikato Maniapoto MB 109 (81 WMN 109) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...July 2014 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S R CLARK Copies to: Carter Kirkland Morrison Limited, Lawyers, P O Box 2137, Shortland Street, Auckland 1140, brent@carterkirklandmorrison.com K R M Littlejohn, Barrister, DX CP18203, Auckland 1010, littlejohn@quaychambers.co.nz 81 Waikato Maniapoto MB 110 Introduction [1] On 27 September 2013 I issued a decision concerning succession to the legal and beneficial interests of the late Rachel Ngeungeu Zister (“Rach...

5. People charged and convicted of cannabis offences December 2021 [xlsx, 226 KB]

   ...Islands Other proved 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Wellington Chatham Islands Not proved 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wellington Chatham Islands Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wellington Chatham Islands Total 1 1 0 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 Wellington Wellington Convicted 169 114 82 101 101 112 101 81 80 69 Wellington Wellington Other proved 36 23 27 18 13 16 10 13 11 9 Wellington Wellington Not proved 36 22 24 29 13 19 22 26 24 38 Wellington Wellington Other 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 1 2 Wellington Wellington Total 241 159 133 148...

6. [2023] NZREADT 28 - Whalan and Partners Ltd v CAC2107 & SL (06 October 2023) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...marketing, fees and commission to be GST inclusive. The vendors specifically referred to cl 7.3 where “Inc of GST” was written. They further added they were not GST registered and pointed out that “IS” in “IS/IS NOT GST registered” (at cl 10.1(k) of the contract) had not been deleted. [11] LQ replied the following day, 26 May 2021. She acknowledged the vendors were not GST registered and stated the property would be sold inclusive of GST. She added (verbatim): �€...

7. Tomov v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 34 [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...does not give rise to any immunity for personal negligent act or omissions, the critical issue is whether the personal involvement of Mr Walsh in the construction was such that he both owed and breached a duty of care to the claimants. [101] Mr Walsh was a credible witness, albeit somewhat guarded as to the role of Mr McLean. His account of his personal role in construction was uncontested. He had no personal involvement in the construction of the cladding and he was not i...

8. National Standards Committee 1 v Deliu [2016] NZLCDT 27 [pdf, 480 KB]

   .............................................................................. 20 Charge 1 – negligence or incompetence (alternative charge 2 – conduct unbecoming) ............................................................................... 21 Particulars 1.01 and 1.02 (alternative 2.01 and 2.02) ..................... 22 Evidence relevant to particulars 1.01 and 1.02 .................... 22 Discussion ...................................

9. Allan v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...confirmed he chose not to have the architect carry out supervision work. He thereby took on this responsibility. He also confirmed he did not engage the builder 2 (8 April 2009) WHT, TRI 2008-101-74, 103-105, 112 & 113, Adjudicator C Ruthe. 16 pursuant to a contract including a management component. Mr O’Fagan took umbrage at the suggestion that by doing this he was cutting corners. The Tribunal accepts he was not doing...

10. Morison v New Zealand Association of Counsellors [2024] NZHRRT 46 [pdf, 362 KB]

    ...and any ACC processes and outcomes. She has not satisfied us that the information she requested was relevant to and might reasonably have been expected to make a material difference to the outcomes of her ACC or other review applications. [101] In her statement of claim dated 27 May 2024 Ms Morison also said: 21 [101.1] She was unable to make informed decisions about healthcare providers because she later found the counsellor had constructed information about her, primaril...