4503 items matching your search terms
...2D Block I WAENGA I A Between TUI NEPATA AND NEPATA HEKE Ngā kaitono Applicants ME And HARVEY KARAITIANA AND RANGI KARAITIANA Ngā kaiurupare Respondents Nohoanga: Hearing 26 July 2023, 297 Waiariki MB 101-104 (Heard at Rotorua) 3 August 2023, (Heard at Taupō) Kanohi kitea: Appearances All parties appeared in person or by Zoom Whakataunga: Judgment date 16 August 2023 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ C T COXHEA...
...since they were introduced in 2000. 10. In 2016, after following the calculation process set out in the Cabinet Guidelines, Hon Rodney Hansen QC recommended that Mr Pora be paid compensation in the amount of $2,520,949.42. That sum included: 10.1. $1,961,895 for non-pecuniary loss, specifically loss of liberty; 10.2. $225,000 for other non-pecuniary losses (loss of reputation, loss or interruption of family and other personal relationships, mental and emotional harm); 10.3. $334,0...
...Inspector has the power to enter, at any reasonable hour, any premises where any person is employed or where the Labour Inspector has reasonable cause to believe that any person is employed (including the 16 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 17 Clause 56. 18 Clause 57. 19 Clause 59. 20 Clause 59A. 21 Clause 59B. 22 Clause 60. 23 Clauses 185H-185I. premises of a controlling third party) accompanied, if the Labour Inspe...
...Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 8 At [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 6 From the adviser [27] There are no submissions from Mr Lawlor. ASSESSMENT [28] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, pro...
...separately in the submissions made to the Court. [25] In his submissions in reply, filed on 12 June 2015, Mr Eichelbaum claims, for Ms Panapa, either the sum of $123.575.76 (being 80 per cent of what counsel submits were her actual costs) or $101,949.99 (being 66 per cent of that estimate). This is said to be the equivalent of costs for 3.5 days of the hearing. [26] Quite apart from the inaptness of such submissions being made strictly in reply, these quantifications do...
...[reopening determination]. 7 AlKazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [2020] NZEmpC 171 [reopening judgment]. 8 AlKazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [2021] NZCA 13 [CA judgment]. 9 Reopening judgment, above n 7, at [24]. 10 AlKazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [2021] NZSC 101 [SC judgment]. The parties agree on factors to be considered [10] As both parties note, in dealing with an application for leave to extend time, the overarching consideration is the interests of justice.11 The specific factor...
...multiplying the Contractor Rate by the amount of Milksolids produced (in kgMS) by the Herd under this Agreement (clause 1.1, Part 3). c) The Owner will pay the Contractor the Contractor Payment calculated using the Contractor Rate set out in Item 5 (cl. 10.1, Pt 3). d) Following termination, each party will be entitled to all payments and deferred payments actually due to that party as at the date of termination, including the Contractor Payment in relation to any unpaid milk payme...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-101-000100 BETWEEN MARK LEYLAND CHAPMAN Claimant AND WESTERN BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT COUNCIL First Respondent AND FLORA CREATIVE LIMITED Second Respondent AND BLUEPRINT DESIGN LIMITED (REMOVED) Third Respondent AND BRIAN AND ROSEMARY COUSINS (REMOVED) Fourth Respondent AND PAUL HAMILTON CLARKE Fifth Respondent AND GRAEME BLISSETT Sixth Respondent AND PETER DAWSON (REMOVED) Seventh Respondent AND GLEN...
...specified time periods. [4] The relevant time period for commencing the proceedings may, however, be extended under PA, s 98(8). That section provides that the Chairperson (which includes a Deputy Chairperson pursuant to the Human Rights Act 1993, s 101A) may agree to extend any time period specified for commencing proceedings if the Chairperson is satisfied that “exceptional circumstances prevented proceedings from being commenced within the specified period”. [5] The provisions...
...the Kashimoto complaint found the complaint to be serious, as Mr Mizoguchi had withheld funds from the Kashimotos in order to pressure them into 14 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 10 signing a false document advancing his interests.15 Nonetheless I do not regard that finding as undermining the appropriateness of the agreement reached as to sanctions. [53] Accordingly, the Tribunal formall...