Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee v RDM [2015] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...engage further with the practitioner before renouncing its executorship. The Tribunal finds that the course of correspondence from the practitioner was not misleading or wrong. The practitioner met his professional obligations as required by Rules 1.01 and 1.08 of the New Zealand Law Society Rules of Professional Conduct for Barristers and Solicitors (2004) Seventh Edition. [26] Arising out of these same matters, the Committee alleged that even if the practitioner’s correspondenc...

2. [2020] NZEnvC 201 Auckland Council v Noe [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...TP06-1 Eurofins Solid 14/02/2020 0.0-0.1 y Chrysotile and amosite TP07-1 Eurofins Solid 14/02/2020 0.0-0.1 y Chrysotile TPOB-1 Eurofins Solid 14/02/2020 0.0-0.1 y Chrysotile and amosite TP09-1 Eurofins Solid 14/02/2020 0.0-0.1 y Chrysotile TP10-1 Eurofins Solid 14/02/2020 0.0-0.1 N N/A TP11-1 Eurofins Solid 14/02/2020 0.0-0.1 y Chrysotile TP12-1 Eurofins Solid 14/02/2020 0.0-0.1 y Chrysotile NOTES mbgl - metres below ground level 2020015 - Appendix C - Table 2 APPENDIX D...

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000270 Tram Lease Limited v New Zealand Transport Agency [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...viewer to provide for a minimum 32.5m (above ground at the site) floor of the volcanic viewshaft. 100.4 Delete Rules 2.11.1.1 and 2.11.1.2 and the basic floor area ratio and bonus floor area controls. Site 26: Other sites: (Maps 26A to 26I) 101 Other sites where similar decisions are sought regarding the general amendments listed in Appendix D include:

4. [2019] NZSSAA 11 (8 March 2019) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...it is appropriate for the Ministry to provide him with the criteria for SLP and assess his entitlement for this assistance. 6 Chief Executive of the Dept of Work and Income v Scoble [2001] NZAR 1011 (HC) at [9]. 7 At [9]–[11]. 5 Koroua v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [2013] NZHC 3418 (HC). https://advance.lexis.com/document/documentlink/?pdmfid=1230042&crid=a576b4d5-c101-49a9-8199-3a73e1458bc1&pd...

5. Bowater - Pouto 2F (2008) 123 Whangarei MB 184 (123 WH 184) [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...Rental 21,113 Stumpage Payment 230,511 26,965 Cash Expenses 28,013 9,520 9,369 2,627 Net Surplus 179,109 38,679 4,150 24,249 Fixed Assets 1,400,000 1,400,000 (Not shown) (Not shown) Current Assets 7,992 33,635 31,043 28,381 Investment 309,876 101,889 78,977 76,282 [10] At the hearing on 27 November 2007 I heard fi'om the trustees and some beneficial owners. While the majority of the trustees had approved the dividend, the beneficial owners had not passed a resolution in s...

6. [2017] NZEmpC 98 Farmer Motor Group Ltd v McKenzie [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...the terms of the written employment agreement. As stated in the judgment: 14 9 Coca Cola Amatil v Kaczorowski [1998] 1 ERNZ 264 (CA at 280. 10 Heeley v Dblshot Ltd [2013] NZERA Auckland 101. 11 Smith, above n 2. 12 At [61]. 13 At [105] and see Hutchison v Canon New Zealand Ltd [2014] NZERA Wellington 72. 14 At [107]. The sections are intended to complement parties’ agreements and indeed, require,...

7. Beattie v Official Assignee [2021] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...of practice issued under section 46 or section 63, conduct is excepted from conduct that is an interference with the privacy of an individual, the onus of proving the exception in any proceedings under this Part lies upon the defendant. Section 101 of the 2020 Act is to the same effect. [76] As held in Geary v Accident Compensation Corporation [2013] NZHRRT 34 at [74] and [75], the relevant date on which the agency must have good reason for refusing access to personal information is th...

8. Ween v Betty's Empire Ltd [2020] NZHRRT 48 [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...the order and Betty’s Empire ordered a courier to uplift the goods from her. Ms Ween was provided with an apology and a full refund. Subsequent actions of Betty’s Empire [10] Mr Rigden, a director of Betty’s Empire, gave evidence that: [10.1] On 9 November 2018 he called Ms Ween to discuss the issue. He apologised again for the mistake and assured her that steps would be taken to stop it from happening again. He offered Ms Ween a $200 gift voucher as compensation, should she...

9. ENV-2016-AKL-000275 Dilworth Trust Board v New Zealand Transport Agency [pdf, 10 MB]

   ...HeIght Intense, high quality, compact city fonn. In this regard. DIlworth supports the ·Addltlonal Zone Controls Height Control· overtay as It applles to their landholdings at the fon0v.4ng sites: 99 Remuera Road (NlI'Mnarket, 24.5m16 storeys) 101 Remuera Road (Newmarket, 24.5mJ6storeys) 8 51 Marks Road (Newmarket. 24.5m16 storeys) 9 51 Marks Road (Newmarket, Z4.5m16 storeys) 47D-474 Broadway (NewmalXet, 24.5ml6storeys) 476-480 Broadway (NewmalXel 24.5m16 storeys) 500 Broa...

10. 2021-02-04 GlenAyr Ltd evidence [pdf, 4.9 MB]

    ...Consultants $2520 • ORC processing $5350 Water consent renewal costs • Water resource Management $6720 • McKeague Consultants $24,840 • NIWA gauging $890 • Legal $20,420 • ORC processing deposit $48,220 under objection • Total $101,090 • Is this realistic and sustainable for Otago irrigators? Irrigation Development costs $1m+ • Dam $501,000 • Pivot with VRI $277,375 • Pump set up $86,055 • Power set up $71,890 • Earthworks $77,030 • Fenc...