Search Results

Search results for 101.

4506 items matching your search terms

  1. Deputy Registrar - Rakiura Maori Lands Trust (2013) 21 Te Waipounamu MB 35 (21 TWP 35) [pdf, 96 KB]

    ...to two people by ticking the box beside the person you wish to vote for. (Emphasis added). [18] The AGM was held 20 October 2012 at Awarua Marae, Bluff. The result of the trustee election was: Theona Heaslip – 108 votes; Stephen Harteveld – 101 votes; Simon Gomez – 99 votes; Ray Smith – 68 votes; and Peter Vella – 60 votes. Issues 21 Te Waipounamu MB 39 [19] Mr Manning raises two main concerns about the pre-election process. Firstly, he says the trustees had n...

  2. CAC 10054 v Subritzky [2012] NZREADT 19 [pdf, 129 KB]

    ...had served papers at Now Realty. The defendant denied that the previous incident at Now Realty had occurred and said he would have met me in order to be served. 8. We then both climbed into our cars. I was writing down the address, time (1.01pm) and his registration number when he pulled out of the driveway and started to drive away. The defendant then stopped and reversed his car so that he was alongside mine and wound down his window. He now 4 Appeared angry. He to...

  3. E32 Dr Kala Sivaguru - Ecology - EIC - Council [pdf, 728 KB]

    ...same area rather than monitoring randomly every year to monitor the changes in the communities. 6 E16, page 1004 onwards. 7 E16, page 1007 onwards. 1552 10 10. CONCLUSIONS 10.1 Overall, as stated in above sections, I consider that any potential adverse effects on marine ecology including avifauna, marine mammals, sediment and water quality resulting from the proposal would be minor, subject to adherence to the P...

  4. Big Hill Station Ltd v Hemana - Awarua o Hinemanu Trust (2015) 43 Takitimu MB 218 (43 TKT 218 ) [pdf, 328 KB]

    ...Patrick Parsons [70] Telfer Young [72] Were the legal costs reasonably incurred? [77] Applicant’s submissions [77] Respondents’ submissions [79] The Law [84] Discussion [86] Should an award of costs be made on any alternative basis? [101] Applicant’s submissions [101] Respondents’ submissions [102] The Law [103] Discussion [105] Are the respondents entitled to indemnity under the Trustee Act 1956? [110] Respondents’ submissions [110] Applicant’s submissio...

  5. [2021] NZIACDT 13 - TI v Malcolm (8 June 2021) [pdf, 220 KB]

    ...client and provide objective advice … 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 8 File management 26. A licensed immigration adviser must: … b. confirm in writing to the client when applications have been lodged, and make on-going timely updates … e. maintain each client file...

  6. VL Nair v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 86 (15 September 2014) [pdf, 183 KB]

    ...conduct are maintained in the occupation concerned.” 3 [10] When imposing sanctions those statutory purposes require consideration of at least four factors which may materially bear upon maintaining appropriate standards of conduct: [10.1] Protecting the public: Section 3 of the Act states “The purpose of this Act is to promote and protect the interests of consumers receiving immigration advice ...” [10.2] Demanding minimum standards of conduct: Dentice v Valuers Regi...

  7. O’Hagan v New Zealand Police (Discovery) [2017] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 297 KB]

    ...timeframe but deny any consequential interference with Mr O’Hagan’s privacy. [10] The Police having admitted the breach of the statutory timeframe, the issues to be determined at the substantive hearing are accordingly narrow and concern: [10.1] Whether, in terms of the Privacy Act, s 66(2)(b), there was a proper basis for the deemed refusal to make the requested information available. [10.2] Whether, in terms of s 66, there has been an interference with the privacy of Mr O’Haga...

  8. [2022] NZIACDT 21 - CT v Nandan (18 August 2022) [pdf, 215 KB]

    ...Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 6 Section 50. 7 Section 51(1). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 8, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 7 Invoices 22. A licensed immigration adviser must, each time a fee and/or disbursement is payable, provide the client with an invoice containing a full description of the services the fee relates to and/or...

  9. People charged and convicted of driving under the influence offences June 2019 [xlsx, 867 KB]

    ...Waikato Te Awamutu Convicted 162 148 136 93 97 58 62 86 91 105 Waikato Te Awamutu Other proved 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Waikato Te Awamutu Not proved 11 14 4 3 4 1 6 2 4 8 Waikato Te Awamutu Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waikato Te Awamutu Total 174 164 141 97 101 59 68 89 95 114 Waikato Te Kuiti Convicted 122 112 112 87 78 95 55 68 63 49 Waikato Te Kuiti Other proved 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Waikato Te Kuiti Not proved 8 5 6 3 1 2 4 3 2 2 Waikato Te Kuiti Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waikato Te Kuiti...

  10. [2023] NZIACDT 14 - II v Sun (26 April 2023) [pdf, 118 KB]

    ...Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 10 Section 50. 11 Section 51(1). 12 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 13 At [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 7 From Mr Sun [32] The Tribunal has received no submissions or communications from Mr Sun. [33] The Tribunal records that the Registrar sent the statement of complaint to Mr Sun and the complainant on about 10...