Search Results

1. [2020] NZIACDT 24 - BV v Aiolupotea (12 June 2020) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...[2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 6 Section 50. 7 Section 51(1). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 8, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 7 [36] The Tribunal has received from the Registrar the statement of complaint (4 July 2019), together with supporting documents. [37] A minister of religion advised the Tribunal by email on 21 August 2019 tha...

2. E45 Glen Wright - Lighting - EIC - Council [pdf, 764 KB]

   ...unnecessary lighting glare effects as reasonably practical. In particular, this refers to non-dwelling residential uses such as hotels and commercial outdoor dining, such as the eateries along North Wharf and Princes Wharf. 10. CONCLUSIONS 10.1 If the installation of the construction lighting complies with proposed consent conditions 111, 112 and 113 and the CLMP, it is my expectation that the construction lighting effects will be less than minor. I consider that the draft CLMP...

3. LA - Part 2 - Areas of Law Criminal [pdf, 882 KB]

   ...Text55: Text56: Text66: Text76: Text86: Text96: Text57: Text67: Text77: Text87: Text97: Text58: Text68: Text78: Text88: text98: Text59: Text69: Text79: Text89: Text99: Text60: Text70: Text80: Text90: Text101: Text61: Text71: Text81: Text91: Text102: Text62: Text72: Text82: Text92: Text103: Text63: Text73: Text83: Text93: Text104: Text64: Text74: Text84: Text94: text105: Text65: Text75: Text85: Tex...

4. [2017] NZEnvC 123 Dunedin City Council v Saddle Views Estate Ltd [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...of Mr Thomson. He is of the opinion 12 that SVEL's operations contravene a rule in the operative district plan. That is sufficiently particular to notify SVEL of the case it has to meet. 11 12 Walden v Auckland City Council (1992) NZRMA 101 (NZEnvC) at 103. C R Thomson, affidavit dated 7 April 2011 at para [3]. 8 [22] The notice of opposition claimed the application is an abuse of the process of the court. I do not see any merit in this point (which was not argued at the...

5. Bonner v Accident Compensation Corporation (Rehabilitation) [2024] NZACC 164 (15 October 2024) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...whole the Court could not accept that the decision was proper and fair. 1 Kacem v Bashir [2010] NZSC 112; [2011] 2 NZLR 1. 2 Gregory v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZACC 118. 3 Waaka v Accident Compensation Corporation [2003] NZACC 101. 9 Discussion [30] The issue in this case is whether the Corporation correctly declined Mr Bonner’s request of 20 July 2022 for funding towards an ATV. Mr Bonner may be eligible for entitlements in respect of a personal injur...

6. People with finalised charges and convicted of firearm related offences jun2024 [xlsx, 316 KB]

   ...offence 2,493 2,646 3,116 3,403 3,384 3,711 4,368 3,894 4,547 5,046 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Other offences 215,676 217,541 222,810 218,357 209,493 200,867 207,733 164,310 187,740 211,838 99% 99% 99% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% Total 218,169 220,187 225,926 221,760 212,877 204,578 212,101 168,204 192,287 216,884 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Table 1b: Number and percentage of finalised charges for firearm-related offences, by charge outcome, 2014/2015 - 2023/2024 E...

7. Statutes-Amendment-Bill_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...Lt>ad agt>ncy Proposing Ministt>r 42. Wildlife Act 1953 Depa1tment of Conservation Minister of Conservation Hon Tama Potaka 6 Two proposals were opposed dming cross-paity consultation and have subsequently been removed: 6.1 Amending 10(1) of the Kainga Ora - Homes and Communities Act 2019 to reduce the minimmn size for the Kainga Ora board from eight to six. This change would renun the size to the original minimmn setting to allow more flexibility in board succession planni...

8. [2024] NZEnvC 259 Williams v Nelson City Council [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...Williams’ indication that the hedge is in the order of 2.75-3.65m high (depending on where it is measured). The consequences of the height difference for the above-noted second prerequisite for existing use rights 7 RMA, s281(2). 8 RMA, s10(1)(a)(ii). 8 cannot be adjudged without evidence. [20] Interestingly, the further limitation in s10(3) RMA would not appear to apply in that it is confined to “reconstruction or alteration of, or extension to, any building” as...

9. [2024] NZEmpC 224 Kongbang v Lotus Touch Ltd [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...– s 142X; (c) when a person involved in a breach is liable for default in payment of wages or other money due to an employee – s 142Y; (d) how a state of mind of a body corporate is established – s 142Z; and 8 Legislation Act 2019, s 10(1). (e) where conduct engaged in on behalf of a body corporate can be attributed to that body corporate – s 142ZA. [16] Sections 142W and 142Y are relevant to these proceedings. [17] The purpose of s 142Y is stated in its hea...

10. Ross v Edwards - Waikite 3A [2024] Māori Appellate Court MB 100 (2024 APPEAL 100) [pdf, 245 KB]

    ...Judge M P Armstrong (Presiding) Judge A H C Warren Judge T K T A R Williams Whakataunga: Judgment date 22 May 2024 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā TE KOOTI Reserved Judgment of the Court 2024 Māori Appellate Court MB 101 Hei tīmatanga kōrero Introduction [1] On 5 April 2023, Judge Wara granted an injunction requiring Mr Ross to vacate Waikite 3A and to remove the buildings and his possessions from the land.1 [2] Mr Ross sought a rehearing of...