Search Results

1. [2023] NZREADT 11 - CAC 2103 v Lieven (15 May 2023) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...his or her conduct might breach the Act, but proceeded regardless.18 [76] Ms Lieven is alleged to have wilfully or recklessly breached r 6.3 of the Rules. This Rule was considered by the Tribunal in Jackman v Complaints Assessment Committee 10100 where it accepted that a breach of r 6.3 would be justified by conduct which:19 …if known by the public generally, would lead them to think that licensees should not condone it or find it to be acceptable. Acceptance that such conduc...

2. [2023] NZEmpC 191 Appleton v Tasman Cargo Airlines Pty Ltd [pdf, 311 KB]

   ...Relations Act 2000, s 123(1)(c)(i). 15 Richora Group Ltd v Cheng [2018] NZEmpC 113, [2018] ERNZ 337. See too Waikato District Health Board v Archibald [2017] NZEmpC 132 at [62]; and GF v Comptroller of the New Zealand Customs Service [2023] NZEmpC 101 at [162]: band 1 $0-$12,000; band 2 $12,000-$50,000; band 3 over $50,000. [99] In the circumstances, and taking into account recent compensatory awards, I consider that, but for contribution, Mr Appleton would have been entitl...

3. [2023] NZIACDT 9 - WS v Lawlor (23 March 2023) [pdf, 318 KB]

   ...Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 9 Section 50. 10 Section 51(1). 11 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 12 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 11, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 14 (1) The expression filed by Mr Lawlor did not lead to them being able to apply for residence under the special 2021 instructions. Immigration NZ told them there was no expression in the system (the...

4. People charged and convicted of homicide offences December 2018 [xlsx, 105 KB]

   ...outcome 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Homicide and related offences total Convicted 104 139 99 79 110 154 118 148 151 146 45% 57% 54% 55% 54% 68% 68% 64% 68% 62% Other proved 0 1 1 4 3 3 10 10 6 12 0% <1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 6% 4% 3% 5% Not proved 121 101 77 55 87 57 46 62 58 69 52% 41% 42% 38% 43% 25% 26% 27% 26% 29% Other 7 3 7 6 3 11 0 13 8 8 3% 1% 4% 4% 1% 5% 0% 6% 4% 3% Total 232 244 184 144 203 225 174 233 223 235 1...

5. 4. Roebeck affidavit (with exhibits) [pdf, 7 MB]

   ................................................................................ 20 9.3 APPOINTMENT OF AUDITOR ........................................................................................ 20 10. SUBSIDIARIES TO PREPARE PLANS AND REPORTS ................................................ 20 10.1 SUBSIDIARIES TO PREPARE PLANS AND STATEMENTS OF INTENT ................................ 20 10.2 TRUSTEE APPROVAL REQUIRED .......................................................................

6. LCRO 52/2017 BL v JC (30 November 2018) [pdf, 332 KB]

   ...arithmetical calculation”,23 one lawyer may reach a “different conclusion[s]” from another lawyer “as to what sum is fair and reasonable, although all should fall within a bracket which, in the vast majority of cases, will be narrow”.24 [101] For that reason, there is a “proper reluctance to ‘tinker’ with bills by adjusting them by small amounts”. It “is therefore appropriate for Standard’s Committees not to be unduly timid when considering what a fair and reason...

7. INZ v Soni [2018] NZIACDT 6 (9 March 2018) [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...irregularities. He also accepted he did not confirm discussions in writing adequately. [9] Mr Soni did not accept he allowed his employee to do more than permitted and appropriate clerical work. [10] There are two matters the Tribunal must determine: [10.1] What in fact happened, as that is contentious; and [10.2] How those facts sit in relation to the restrictions on unlicensed personnel providing immigration services. [11] It is of course critical to bear in mind that any prof...

8. People with finalised charges and convicted of offences related to family violence December 2023 [xlsx, 624 KB]

   ...detention 217 237 256 274 296 215 86 33 37 28 7% 8% 8% 8% 9% 13% 13% 9% 11% 8% Male assaults female Intensive supervision 185 223 258 266 319 195 66 41 46 29 6% 7% 8% 8% 10% 11% 10% 11% 14% 9% Male assaults female Community work 925 824 905 807 678 271 101 62 35 41 32% 27% 27% 24% 21% 16% 15% 16% 11% 12% Male assaults female Supervision 368 383 415 417 413 214 83 33 41 41 13% 13% 12% 13% 13% 13% 13% 9% 12% 12% Male assaults female Monetary 90 84 78 67 94 34 12 10 4 8 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 3%...

9. [2015] NZEmpC 138 NZ Meat Workers Union Inc v South Pacific Meats Ltd and Talley [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...the Court or the Authority, so that there should be no reason why the existence of the privilege should differ between the two bodies. 15 Aarts v Barnardos New Zealand [2013] NZEmpC 85 at [98]-[101]. 16 Defendants’ summary of [98]–[101]. [31] Next, Ms Pidduck submitted that the fact that the Authority is an inquisitorial body does not justify any abrogation of the right to assert a privilege against self- incriminatio...

10. Singh v McKee [2024] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 259 KB]

    ...only. Mr McKee stopped behaving like this to him after he received the email. 4 [10] Mr McKee disputed much of Mr Singh’s evidence as to how he behaved and denied any of the behaviour amounts to racial harassment. In particular, he: [10.1] Denied he ever commented on, made fun of or mocked Mr Singh’s accent. [10.2] Denied he often objected to Mr Singh and other Indian employees conversing in Hindi and told them to only speak English at work. He said he had once asked em...