Canterbury District Law Society v Wood [2009] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 225 KB]
...those complaints. [7] The fourth complaint, that Mr Wood had misled the Court and a practitioner, was upheld, and, in its decision of 19 November 2008, the Complaints Committee decided that charges should be laid against Mr Wood pursuant to s.101 of the Law Practitioners Act 1982. [8] As a consequence Mr Wood was charged with: [a] Misconduct in his professional capacity (s.112(1)(a) of the Law Practitioners Act 1982); and, in the alternative; [b] Professional negligence of...