Search Results

1. [2021] NZACC 7 - Stryder v ACC (12 January 2021) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...7 June 2018 is quashed. [100] There will need to be engagement between the parties on the issue of the quantum of weekly compensation to be paid to the appellant during this period to take account matters including what he actually earned. [101] Should there be any issue as to costs counsel have leave to file memoranda in respect thereof. Judge C J McGuire District Court Judge Solicitors: P Sara, Barrister and Solicitor, Dunedin for the appellant Young,...

2. [2019] NZEmpC 45 Chambers v Pelabon [pdf, 347 KB]

   ...first determination was issued on 6 October 2017, ordering ZRNL to pay Mr Pelabon $10,824.07 in wages, holiday pay and compensation.1 In a 1 Pelabon v Zumo Retail Nelson Ltd [2017] NZERA Wellington 101. subsequent determination of 2 February 2018, the Authority ordered ZRNL to contribute $2,250 towards costs associated with Mr Pelabon’s substantive claim.2 Neither determination was challenged. [3] Since ZRNL did not pa...

3. Hutana - Estate of Te Whe Ariki Hutana (2019) 53 Te Waipounamu MB 97 (53 TWP 97) [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...argument in this application has been significantly narrowed through the course of the hearings with the assistance of legal counsel. The sole issue remaining for determination is the issue of interpretation of the will. 53 Te Waipounamu MB 101 [11] Counsel acting for the trustee of the estate confirms she does not dispute cl 4 of the will which deals with specific bequests. The clauses that remain at issue are cl 5.1(b) which deals with the residuary estate, and cl 7.2 whi...

4. INZ (Gilray) v Croxson [2019] NZIACDT 72 (18 October 2019) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...[2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 8 ASSESSMENT [41] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with d...

5. FBN v Broadway [2019] NZIACDT 70 (7 October 2019) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...[2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 8 [41] According to counsel, it is acknowledged by Ms Broadway that she failed to have a services agreement, as she should have had. She was unfamiliar with her need to establish a professional relationship w...

6. [2020] NZIACDT 44 - Registrar v Yoon (8 October 2020) [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...7 Section 51(1). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 8, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 13 [66] The adviser denies all the allegations in the statement of complaint. ASSESSMENT [67] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be

7. MOJ0047.03_factsheet_JUL23-Tongan_WEB.pdf [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...pē pe ko e hā ‘a e fuoloa ‘o e founga ngāue ko iá. Tokoni ‘oku ‘atā atú ‘Oku ‘oatu ‘e he ACC ha tokoni fakapa‘anga kapau kuo pekia ha mēmipa ‘o e fāmilí pe kāingá meí ha fakatu‘utāmaki. Telefoni ta‘etotongi: 0800 101 996. Uepisaití: acc.co.nz/im-injured/financial-support/financial- support-after-death ‘Oku ‘oatu ‘e he After a Suicide ha sēvesi tokoni ‘i he ‘initanetí ‘oku fakahoko atu ‘e he Mental Health Foundation ma‘á e ngaahi fāmili...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 106 Ling v Super Cuisine Group Ltd [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...and 22 Richora Group Ltd v Cheng [2018] NZEmpC 113, [2018] ERNZ 337 at [67]; and Waikato District Health Board v Archibald [2017] NZEmpC 132, [2017] ERNZ 791 at [62]. 23 GF v Comptroller of the New Zealand Customs Service [2023] NZEmpC 101 at [162]. supporting material, with the defendant having a further 14 days within which to respond. Any reply should be filed within a further seven days. Kathryn Beck Judge Judgment signed at 9 am on 13 Ju...

9. Tong & Anor v CAC 20004 & Ors [2014] NZREADT 3 [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...order under s 93(1)(f) cannot be made in respect of a straight monetary loss, i.e. compensation for a loss in market value and potential unrealised gain, which is the case here where the appellant is seeking compensation of this kind in the sum of $101,117 (loss in value and potential unrealised gain). Following the decision in Quin, neither the potential loss in value nor the loss of potential unrealised gain can be awarded.” [20] In Orsborn v REAA & Collier & Anor [2013]...

10. Quin v REAA & Knaptondocx [2012] NZREADT 13 [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...building retaining and pedestrian stairs to the new entrance gate to the dwelling; [c] $27,472.27: expenses in relocating to the same standard a driveway of compacted and loose gravel. 5 [9] The complainants sought total relief of $101,871.30 but did not itemise the remaining $49,274.43. Alternatively, they sought what they considered to be the “maximum penalty” of $100,000 “to compensate for both expenses and compensation”. [10] There are additional invoice...